This is the view of State Bank of India.   

State Bank of India

kanchan 

Central Recruitment & Promotion Department, 

Corporate Centre, Tulsiani Chambers

1st Floor (West Wing), 212, 

Free Press Journal Marg, 

Nariman Point, Mumbai - 400021.

Tel. No.: 91 - 022 - 2282 O427.

Fax: 91 - 022 - 2282 0411.

E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Under Secretary to the Govt. of India,

Ministry of Finance,

Department of Financial Services,

Jeevan Deep, 

10, Parliament Street,

New Delhi-110001.

            

No. CRPD/AB/2007/891                                                         
Dated: November 14, 2007

 

Dear Sir,

 

Notice of Hearing U/S 63 of The Persons With Disabilities Act 1995 Case No. 
3929/2007.

 

We refer to your letter No. F.3/6/2007-SCT (B) dated 6th November 2007 in the 
captioned matter.

 

In this connection, we have to advise that the scribes are allowed to help the 
persons with visual/locomotive impairment  to read the question paper and write 
the answers relating to concerned examinations. Until July 2007, we had allowed 
scribes on following terms and conditions to assist the visually/locomotor 
impaired candidates in terms of guidelines issued by the Office of the Chief 
Commissioner for Disabilities vide letter no. 27– UP(38)/C.C.D/2000/5751 dated 
10.05.2000 (Annexure 'A')–

 

  1.. Scribe/Writer must be on grade junior in academic qualification from the 
candidate.
  2.. Scribe/Writer should be one possessing 50% or less marks.
  3.. Scribe/Writer should be from academic discipline other than that of the 
candidate.
  4.. Scribe/Writer should be arranged by the candidate at their own cost 
(discretion has been given to the examining authority).
 

In the meantime, we received a notice from the Dy. Chief Commissioner, In the 
Court of the Chief Commissioner for Persons With Disabilities on a complaint 
filed by the National Association for the Blind (Annexure 'B'), wherein the 
Court took cognizance of raising of the limit for scribes to 60% by some Banks. 
Earlier, the complainant had requested us to raise/liberalize the criteria on 
the basis of their letter no. EMP:SVK/2007/64 dated May 15, 2007, wherein they 
provided us with a copy of Court Order No. PIL No. 129of2003 and         
Maharashtra Government directives vide circular no. 06-07/2951 dated December 
20, 2006 (Annexure ‘C’). The following guidelines have been laid down by the 
Maharashtra Government therein relating to qualification of a scribe-  

a)      It is desirable that the candidate and the scribe are from the same 
stream.

b)      In case the candidate avails the services of his/her own scribe/writer, 
the scribe/writer should be one grade junior in academic qualification than the 
candidate if from the same stream. However, this condition shall not apply if 
the scribe/writer is from a different stream.

c)      No other restriction should be imposed on the selection of a 
scribe/writer.

 

It would appear-from the order that the above guidelines are mainly for 
academic examinations involving streams like Arts, Science and Commerce etc. 
and are applicable for tests conducted by Maharashtra Government and not for 
All India tests like our recruitment examinations.

 

On the complaint of National Association for the Blind, the Commission also 
directed the State Bank of India to appear before it (Annexure 'B'). We 
appeared before the Commission and put forth our viewpoint and also made our 
submissions vide our letter no. CRPD/AB/2007/243 dated August 01, 2007 
(Annexure 'D'). However, on the advise of the Commission (Annexure 'E'), the 
Bank agreed to raise the marks stipulation to 60% as an interim measure.     

 

In this matter though the Commission has not directed us on any issue in its 
record of proceedings dated 18th October 2007, we are of the view that our 
recruitment examinations are of the nature of competitive examinations, which 
generally covers all streams of educations and it is essential that the scribe 
possess lesser marks than the candidate. As the minimum graduation marks are 
usually fixed at 50-55% for SC/ST/PWD candidates, it was appropriate that the 
scribe should not have more than 50% marks. Secondly, as per the complainant, 
it is very difficult to get scribes/writer with marks of 50% or less. We do not 
agree with this. We still strongly believe in the Commission's earlier 
directives, cited above. The persons with impairment  need scribes who can 
clearly read the question paper arid write the answer as directed by the 
candidate. For this, the scribe/writer need not be highly qualified. A class 
X/XII/Intermediate/graduate passed candidate, who is fit and alert, is 
sufficient for this purpose. This was the substance of our argument placed 
before the Commission. 

 

Submitted for your information.

 

Yours faithfully.

 

General Manager

Encl: as above.

\\ABHlJEET\avijit\Clcrical Rect\Commission.doc2

 



 

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER

FOR DISABILITIES

(A STATUTORY OFFICE OF

THE GOVT. OF INDIA)

 No. 27-UP (38)/C.C.D/2000/5751

 

Mr. Harinder Singh 

Joint secretary  

Department of Personnel and Training

North Block, New Delhi                                                          
                         10.5.2000

 

 

Sub: - Modifications In the written tests and Interviews for persons with 
disabilities in the matter of direct recruitment/selection or promotion.

 

Dear Sir,

In the recent past several complaints pertaining to discrimination in the 
written tests and interviews have been reported by persons with disabilities. 
In order to equalize opportunities for the disabled in the matter of written 
tests and Interviews for Recruitment/Selection or promotion certain arrangement 
needs to be provided such as:

 

1. SCRIBES/WRITERS FOR BLIND/LOW VISION AND LOCOMOTOR IMPAIRED HAVING 
DISABILITY IN BOTH HANDS AND ARMS.

 

(a)     Blind/Low vision persons due to the nature of their disability cannot 
negotiate the question paper available in Ink print, unless a sighted person 
reads out the question paper to them. Therefore, it becomes absolutely 
necessary that a sighted assistant is made available for blind/low vision 
persons for reading the question paper. 

 

(b)     Similarly/the Blind/Low vision persons can write their assignment in 
braille script which the sighted examiners cannot comprehend, therefore, it is 
essential that the blind/low vision persons are provided with the assistance of 
a scribe/writer for the purpose of writing the tests for recruitment or 
promotion. 

 

(c)     Person having impairment of movement in arms and hands though can read 
independently but have problem in writing the test at a high speed, therefore, 
require assistance of a scribe for the purpose of writing the tests for 
recruitment or promotion. 

 

(d)     The persons with disabilities (Equal opportunities, protection of 
Rights and Full participation) Act1995 in section 31 states 

“All educational institutions shall provides or cause to be provided amanuensis 
to blind students and students with or low vision."

 

In view of the above, it is suggested that all establishments conducting 
written tests for recruitment to jobs or promotion should ensure that persons 
who are blind/low vision or locomotor impaired in both hands and both arms 
should be provided with the assistance of a scribe or writer, for the purpose 
of writing test for recruitment to jobs or promotion to next grade. Blind/low 
vision persons are already getting the facility of a writer for the purpose of 
school and college examinations. Therefore, providing writers for taking, 
recruitment test and promotion tests, is fully justified.      

 

Writers/Scribes should be provided on following terms and conditions:

i)                    Scribe/Writer must be one grade junior in academic 
qualification from the candidate. 

ii)                   Scribe/Writer should be one possessing 50% or less marks.

iii)                 Scribe/Writer should be from academic discipline other 
than that of the candidate,

iv)                 Scribe/writer should either be provided by the examining 
authority or can be arranged by the candidate. This is at the discretion of the 
examining authority,

 

2. ALLOTMENT OF EXTRA TIME IN WRITING TESTS FOR RECRUITMENT/SELECTION TO JOBS 
OR PROMOTION.

 

It is evident that the candidate who writes the test with the assistance of a 
scribe/writer would write at a slower pace. Whereas the, candidate speaks the 
answer and the writer writes the, answer after-listening to the answer of the 
candidate. In this process the time consumed in writing the answer is higher 
than that of the non-disabled candidates. With the view to judge the 
performance of candidates writing tests with the help of scribes and candidates 
writing test by themselves it is necessary to equalize the opportunities by 
granting extra time. The examining authorities are advised to:

(i)                  For a written test,of1 hour duration, at least 20 minutes 
extra time should be allotted.

(ii)                Similarly, for written tests Involving more than one or 
less than one hour extra time should be worked out on the basisof20 minutes per 
one hour.

 

3. ALTERNATIVE QUESTIONS FOR THE BLIND/LOW VISION.

Sec. 30 (f) of the Disability Act stipulates,

“Without prejudice to the foregoing provisions, the appropriate Governments 
shall by notification prepare a comprehensive education scheme which shall make 
Provision for suitable modification in the examination system to eliminate 
purely mathematical questions for the benefit of blind students and students 
with low vision;”

For blind/low-vision persons purely mathematical questions should be eliminated 
as per Sec. 30 (f). It would be logical to eliminate, those sections from the 
written test which are purely visual In nature such as graphs, pictures or 
maps. If, the blind persons are exempted from purely mathematical questions it 
would be appropriate to suitably modify other visual sections too. Therefore, 
it is suggested that all, the examining authorities must; issue instructions to 
the paper setters so that alternative questions of' equal value are worked out 
for blind and low vision students in lieu of the purely visual questions. In 
case where alternative questions in lieu of the purely visual questions are not 
provided then, the candidates must be awarded marks on such sections based on 
the overall average of marks otherwise obtained by the candidates in other 
sections of the paper barring those Involving visual sections. This would 
equalize opportunities in the written test for the disabled.

            

4. INTERPRETERS FOR HEARING IMPAIRED PERSONS.

            

Interview is an important part of any recruitment process. Persons with Hearing 
Impairment and Speech Impairment, though having excellent communication skills 
must use services of an interpreter during the interview. This would ensure 
smooth and better communication between interviewers and the Hearing Impaired 
and Speech Impaired interviewees. Presence of the Interpreter would rule out 
possibility of communication gaps. Interpreter should be ideally of the 
disabled person’s choice from the same city because in the sign language there 
are as many dialects as in the spoken language. Interpreter from one language 
zone can, not Interpret for another linguistic zone. For utmost efficiency it 
is better that the interpreter is of the candidates own choice

 

We request you to advise all the heads of the ministries and departments and 
heads of recruiting agencies such as UPSC, SSC, BSRB, RRB and all heads of 
Public Sector undertakings to ensure suitable modifications for the disabled in 
the written tests conducted by them for recruitment/selection or promotion.

 

Sincerely yours,

(Anuradha Mohit)

Copy to:

  1.. Executive Director (Personnel), NHPC Ltd, Sector 33, Faridabad
  2.. Executive Director (Personnel), NTPC Ltd., NTPC Bhawan, core -7, scope 
Complex -7, Industrial Area, Lodh1 Road, New Delhi
  3.. General Manager (HR), Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Scope Complex, Core 2, 
7, Industrial area, Lodhi Road, New Delhi.   ,
  4.. Secretary, central Recruitment Board (state Bank Group), Madhulie 1st 
Floor, H/2, Shivsagar Estate, Dr. annie Besant Road, Worli, Mumbai 400018
            

(Anuradha Mohit)

 

 

Room No. 120, I.P.H. Building, 4, Vishnu Digamber Marg, New Delhi-110002 Tel.: 
3234101 Fax: 3221080 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web Site : 
www.nic.in/ccdisabilities 

Kanchan Pamnani
Advocate & Solicitor
9, Suleman Chambers,
Battery Street, Colaba,
Mumbai - 400 039.


To unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the subject unsubscribe.

To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please 
visit the list home page at
  http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in

Reply via email to