all the best of luck Murali sir.

On 6/13/23, Ketan Kothari <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear Murali,
>
> This certainly needs to be challenged.   I had discussed the matter
> with Shree Rajesh Aggarwal, our department secretary and he had also
> concurred.  The problem here is the judges are not exposed to
> hardships of the disabled and in many cases, they go by their common
> understanding.
>
> Sad indeed!
>
> On 12/06/2023, Muralidharan Vishwanath <[email protected]> wrote:
>> June 12, 2023
>>
>> *Press Statement*
>>
>>
>>
>> In a Writ Petition {W.P.(C) 2501/2019}, the National Platform for the
>> Rights of the Disabled (NPRD) had prayed before the Delhi High Court to
>> set
>> aside a circular issued by the Indian Railways making it mandatory for
>> disabled persons desirous of availing concessions for rail travel to
>> procure a separate photo ID card issued by the railways. It was forced to
>> seek legal remedy given the obstinate stance of the Railways.
>>
>>
>>
>> The Court in its order delivered recently, even while acknowledging that
>> the disability certificate issued by the appropriate authority is “valid
>> across India”, contradicts itself by upholding the legitimacy of the
>> issuance of a separate ID card by the railways.
>>
>>
>>
>> The NPRD had contended that apart from the universal validity of the
>> disability certificate issued by a competent authority, the very purpose
>> of
>> the Unique Disability Identity Card (UDID) issued by the Department for
>> Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities (DEPwD) of being a “single
>> document
>> of identification, verfication of the disabled for availing various
>> benefits
>> <https://www.swavlambancard.gov.in/cms/card-benefits>” stands defeated,
>> with the railways adamant on issuing its own separate ID card.
>>
>>
>>
>> The judgment comes at a time when the DEPwD has made the possession of
>> the
>> Unique Disability Identity Card (UDID) mandatory for availing benefits
>> under all central government schemes from April 1, 2023, even while it
>> has
>> failed in getting the Railways to accept it.
>>
>>
>>
>> Unfortunately, the Court has completely overlooked the contention of the
>> petitioner that the Railways are violating the mandate of the Rights of
>> Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 (RPD Act).
>>
>>
>>
>> Equally baffling is the fact that even though the NPRD had not sought any
>> relief with regard to concessions, the entire order is premised on this
>> ground, which is, to put it mildly, a faulty reading of the petition. Of
>> the total nine pages of the order, five and a half pages are devoted
>> merely
>> to detailing the various types of concessions in fares that the railways
>> are providing. Be that as it may, concessions cannot be viewed as some
>> sort
>> of largesse, but as a matter of the duty of the State towards the
>> marginalised and disadvantaged.
>>
>>
>>
>> The NPRD, while expressing its strong displeasure, will be challenging
>> this
>> in the Supreme Court.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *(Muralidharan)*
>>
>> *General Secretary*
>>
>> *National Platform for the Rights of the Disabled (NPRD)*
>>
>> --
>> Disclaimer:
>> 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of
>> the
>> person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity;
>>
>> 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the
>> mails
>> sent through this mailing list..
>>
>>
>> Search for old postings at:
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "AccessIndia" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/a/accessindia.org.in/d/msgid/accessindia/CAL7vCQ0%3DPzxv-hC0fEno5-LiYDtRe6RxGge%2BZFkUJXTmbOuwEg%40mail.gmail.com.
>>
>
>
> --
> Ketan Kothari
> Phone: [r] 02228283281,
> Cell: +919987550614
> +917021054612
> Facebook:  facebook.com/muktaketan
> Twitter:  @muktaketan
> Skype ID: Ketan3333
>
> --
> Disclaimer:
> 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the
> person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity;
>
> 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails
> sent through this mailing list..
>
>
> Search for old postings at:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "AccessIndia" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/a/accessindia.org.in/d/msgid/accessindia/CAC4kLWU-yZbk1hbd32Z%2Beira61AWku2eDdRvuEd2g44V1Ngpnw%40mail.gmail.com.
>

-- 
Disclaimer:
1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the 
person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity;

2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent 
through this mailing list..


Search for old postings at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"AccessIndia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/accessindia.org.in/d/msgid/accessindia/CAKOBzc9o7-G9ZSGebawAeUM7jMu%3DF1ep_r65%3DA5K7ZBf_esKog%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to