Hello:

 

You are most welcome to challenge and question the perspective. The very 
purpose of writing topics like this is to have a healthy discussion and debate. 

 

My only argument in support is this: just because something isn’t as direct and 
as dangerous as discriminatory behaviour doesn’t make it agreeable. In fact, to 
give you an analogy, cancer cells are proteins and they grow painlessly, but 
that doesn’t make them healthy. If a bias exists subconsciously, right under 
the veneer of normal expressions and idioms, it can’t be regarded acceptable. 

 

I encourage you to read the post because I’ve also argued in the post that 
using such cliches are also bad and lazy writing. 

 

So, while I respectfully acknowledge your objections, I stand by what I’ve 
said. 

 

 

 

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf 
Of Vaibhav Bhandari
Sent: 27 July 2025 6:06 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AI] My post on Ableist language and how to remove it from every 
day writing

 

Hi, 

I must respectfully express my disagreement with this perspective. It closely 
resembles a post that appeared some time ago on the Be My Eyes blog, which was 
met with significant criticism from within the disabled community. That post, 
much like this argument, attempted to reframe ordinary, long-established 
expressions as inherently offensive or exclusionary.
>From my observation, this approach ultimately leads to excessive language 
>policing. Once such a precedent is set, it is not long before even neutral 
>expressions like “stand up for yourself” are labeled ableist.
As someone who is blind, I take no issue with commonly used phrases such as 
“blinded by love,” “blindly following,” or “blind spot.” These idioms are part 
of everyday language and are clearly not intended to demean or marginalize 
anyone. Their function is metaphorical, not literal, and they serve to convey 
abstract ideas effectively.
In my view, this kind of hyper-sensitivity detracts from the core issues facing 
the disabled community. The focus must remain on addressing tangible systemic 
challenges rather than attempting to sanitize language to the point of 
absurdity.

 

On Sat, Jul 26, 2025 at 8:55 AM <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

Dear all: 

 

I recently wrote about ableism and how to weed ableist language out of our 
writing. Let me know your thoughts. Also, if you find ableist language, don’t 
hesitate to point it out to the person concerned and ask them to correct. 

 

--- --- ---  

 

What if the harm was not in the action, but in the phrasing?
A quiet shift in words can redraw the borders of inclusion.

 

https://open.substack.com/pub/aatri/p/unbiased-writing-fix-this-mistake?r=83eqk 
<https://open.substack.com/pub/aatri/p/unbiased-writing-fix-this-mistake?r=83eqk&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=true>
 &utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=true

 

 

 

-- 
Disclaimer:
1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the 
person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity;
 
2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent 
through this mailing list..
 
 
Search for old postings at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"AccessIndia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> .
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/accessindia.org.in/d/msgid/accessindia/005701dbfddc%24fa176030%24ee462090%24%40gmail.com
 
<https://groups.google.com/a/accessindia.org.in/d/msgid/accessindia/005701dbfddc%24fa176030%24ee462090%24%40gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
 .




 

-- 

Thanks/regards: Vaibhav Bhandari

-- 
Disclaimer:
1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the 
person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity;
 
2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent 
through this mailing list..
 
 
Search for old postings at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"AccessIndia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> .
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/accessindia.org.in/d/msgid/accessindia/CADDLUp01x%2BH%3DmTGynPbR1P-N2zsjx%3DUMYte%3DGe-%3DCBmmCx4T_Q%40mail.gmail.com
 
<https://groups.google.com/a/accessindia.org.in/d/msgid/accessindia/CADDLUp01x%2BH%3DmTGynPbR1P-N2zsjx%3DUMYte%3DGe-%3DCBmmCx4T_Q%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
 .

-- 
Disclaimer:
1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the 
person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity;

2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent 
through this mailing list..


Search for old postings at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"AccessIndia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/accessindia.org.in/d/msgid/accessindia/032b01dbffca%242b4c9f00%2481e5dd00%24%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to