Few years ago, I read an article about Optocon where the author claimed that 
blind people could fill forms easily with the help of Optocon.  Therefore I 
thought to paste a replica of this article from Braille forum.


PLEASE BRING BACK THE OPTACON! 
 by Pam Coffey 

 For many years, my faithful print-reading aid was the Optacon, distributed by 
Telesensory Systems, then in Palo Alto, Calif. For those of you who are 
relatively new to blindness issues, this was a tactile scanner. Weighing about 
four pounds, it was extremely portable. It had a rechargeable battery pack and 
AC adapter, making it usable when the power went out or you were far from an 
electrical outlet. It was unusually dependable (my Optacon had to be repaired 
only three times), and it was incredibly versatile. 

 To use this device, you placed the camera, which wasn't much larger than a 
finger, onto what you wanted to read. The camera, connected to the main unit by 
a long cable, picked up what was directly underneath it, and the electronics 
within the main unit converted it into tactile vibrations according to the 
shape of the character under the camera. The vibrations registered on a little 
plate, called the array, which was in the main unit. You moved the camera with 
your right hand and read the vibrations with your left index finger. The 
reading was quite slow -- you read only one character at a time -- and 
considerable training was required in order to use the device. But increased 
proficiency came with experience, and the rewards were great, because you had 
absolute control over what you read. 

 Because the camera rested on the material to be read, you could read things 
that were curved, such as labels on soup cans or medicine bottles, without 
first removing the label. You could make adjustments for the size, color, and 
boldness of the print, as well as for the intensity of the vibrations. If the 
text was complicated by graphics, insets, sidebars and other such things, you 
-- and not the machine -- decided how best to deal with them. While you might 
not be able to decipher the minute details of a picture, you could determine 
its size, shape, and other basic characteristics. Because the device did not 
talk to you, your imagination gave voice to what you read, as it does when you 
read braille or a sighted person reads print. 

 When you turned the machine on, you didn't have to wait for it to warm up, and 
you didn't have to wait for it to scan an entire page -- it was "read as you 
go." There was even an optional magnifying lens for extremely small print, and 
an optional typewriter attachment which enabled you to read what you were 
typing. 

 When, in October of 2003, my 26-year-old Optacon let me know that it needed a 
fourth repair, I discovered that not only were they no longer being made, but 
also that no one was servicing them. Therefore, because I am always needing 
access to printed materials, my only choice (since I am not a computer geek) 
was to invest in one of the new-fangled speech-output stand- alone scanners. I 
finally decided on one that was relatively small (about 14 pounds), and that 
didn't require a technician to set it up. This was important, as I would soon 
move from a fair-sized house into an apartment, and because I am not much of a 
techie. 

 I soon found myself at the mercy of the machine. I waited for it to boot up, 
then waited for it to scan a whole page, then, once I was reading, I hoped it 
didn't decide to power down by itself or the power wouldn't go out and I'd lose 
what I was reading. Because the material lays on a flat screen, it must be 
perfectly flat in order to be read properly -- which means peeling the label 
off the soup can. If the material has those complications mentioned above, you 
either endure a considerable wait for everything to process, or you are given 
an announcement such as "no text is recognizable." Also, you have no way of 
knowing how the material is laid out on the page, and things really get 
interesting if the page is larger than the screen. In that case, I scan part of 
it at a time, then jump back and forth between the segments -- possible, but 
often exasperating. This was not an issue with the Optacon. As long as the 
cable would reach, it made no difference. 

 True, you can read faster with the newer machines, but only when no quirks 
appear and no scanning delays occur. And yes, you can save material for later 
use with these machines, which is nice and often convenient, but if the power 
surges while you are feeding the material in, you lose it. In addition, you 
cannot use them without electricity. While, overall, the reading voices of 
these scanners are very good, they sometimes have difficulty dealing with 
regional dialects, foreign words, and abbreviations which can be used for 
several different words (e.g., Dr. can mean "doctor" or "drive"). The machine 
chooses one interpretation for an abbreviation, when the text might refer to 
the other. In addition, you may get the same announcement when a page is 
utterly blank as you do when it is totally covered by a non-captioned picture. 
With the Optacon, on the other hand, if the page was blank, the array didn't 
vibrate at all. If the page was covered by a graphic, the whole array might 
vibrate. 

 Finally, there is the dependability issue. Because the newer, more 
computer-like scanners are so complex, there are more things that can go wrong 
with them. After less than two years, my speech-output scanner had to go across 
the country for repairs, and then two more times over the next seven and a half 
months. In light of this inconvenience, I invested in a second scanner (of a 
different brand) in order to have a backup. This second scanner then became my 
main one. Three months after the warranty expired, it had to go to a 
neighboring state for repairs -- then again after another six months. Because 
these scanners are larger, shipping them for repairs is quite expensive. My 
Optacon, on the other hand, only needed its first repair after seven years. 

 Now don't get me wrong; I am grateful for any means of being able to read 
print, but as one who always preferred braille over talking books, I feel that 
I (and others of the same persuasion) should be given a choice as to how we all 
read printed materials. My plea: Someone out there with the know-how to do so, 
please bring back the Optacon! 


To unsubscribe send a message to [email protected] with 
the subject unsubscribe.

To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please 
visit the list home page at
  http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in

Reply via email to