Dear friends
Such discrimination is going on even in appointment by transfer (confirmation) 
to the IAS category from the in service disabled employees. There is another 
case at Hyderabad. An orthopaedically handicapped officer who was called for 
interview in 2002 under non ICS quota, was not considered though he was fully 
qualified and secured merit as per the norms.
We must fight against such discrimination.

All learned participants of access India and other forums may think of a way 
out.
With Regards
Amruth Reddy
Chairman 
Differently Abled Employees Action Committee, AP, Hyderabad.
Email: amruthredd...@yahoo.co.in


________________________________
From: ambika <ambika_khat...@rediffmail.com>
To: AccessIndia@accessindia.org.in
Sent: Fri, 4 March, 2011 6:42:00 PM
Subject: [AI]  AI:IAS

Dear friends I think that the government is doing very unfair with all the 
disable persons.

I think we should protest against the injustice done to us because, if the 
government will not believe on us then where would we go.

I searched about the revised rooles of 2010 and found that the government is 
not 
paying any attention to words us.

UPSC Training At Appolo, chennai, India 8064968

by K Jha on December 23, 2010

By Lalitha Sridhar 

Despite qualifying for the Indian Administrative Services, disabled candidates 
are being refused the deserved government placements. A national campaign is 
addressing this discrimination

A nationwide campaign by disability activists seeks to highlight the ” blatant 
discrimination by the department of personnel and training (DoPT), GOI” in 
employment of disabled candidates. Two candidates with disabilities who secured 
high rankings in the civil services examinations, and were entitled to entry 
into the Indian Administrative Service (IAS) were given entry only to the 
Indian 
Information Service (IIS) which is much lower in the hierarchy of officers’ 
rankings. Another candidate who was entitled entry into the Indian Revenue 
Service last year was not allotted a category as there was apparently no 
vacancy 
in ‘identified jobs’ for persons with disabilities.

The Disability Act of 1995 provides for reservation in all categories of 
government jobs, but only ‘identified jobs’ for disabled people. This is a 
classification that takes into consideration the disability and, therefore, the 
ability of the person to do a particular job. For almost six years, no jobs 
were 
‘identified’ and the intervening years of reservation were lost to people with 
disabilities. Says Javed Abidi, founder-director of the National Centre for 
Employment of People with Disabilities (NCPEDP): ” Finally, when the Supreme 
Court issued directions, the ministry of social justice and empowerment 
scrambled to put together a rather shoddy job list. Some jobs got identified 
but 
most were left out. The disability sector has been demanding a revision of the 
job list for the last two years but no action has so far been taken. We need a 
clear-cut policy vis–vis recruitment of disabled people in the civil services.” 


Says Rajiv Rajan, co-ordinator of the disability legislation unit at Vidya 
Sagar 
(former Spastics Society of Tamil Nadu), himself disabled by cerebral palsy: ” 
The civil service, which is a dream career for many young people in our 
country, 
has proved to be a nightmare for disabled people. In several instances, in 
spite 
of clearing the preliminaries, the main examinations and the interview rounds 
of 
the civil services exams entirely on merit, disabled people have been rejected 
or effectively demoted on grounds of their disability. They did not avail of 
any 
of the concessions or assistance available to them. The idea of any law or 
policy or reservation is to empower marginalised people, to push them forward. 
However, here the so-called ‘reservation’ is actually pushing people downwards! 
These people declared their disability only to be truthful! Now they are being 
discriminated against because some babus in the DoPT feel that people with 
disabilities cannot, rather should not, be allowed to become IAS officers.” 


M B Pranesh, principal secretary, labour and employment, Tamil Nadu, says: ” 
The 
welfare of the disabled was earlier with the department of employment and 
training. In the ’80s it was shifted to the department of social welfare and, 
subsequently, we have a department for rehabilitation which is headed by a 
special officer. We have 11.8 lakh disabled people (in Tamil Nadu) of whom the 
orthopaedically handicapped are 29% and the visually handicapped, 20%. Other 
handicaps constitute the rest. There will be a time-lag in meeting the 
requirement of 3% job reservation for disabled people in the government 
services 
here because this will apply only to new recruits, and there are certain areas 
in which the departments feel they cannot get work done unless the person is 
100% fit.” 


He adds: ” Like the disabled there are many other categories for whom 
reservations have to be made. All these reservations have been built up into a 
roster. Unless large numbers are recruited, the real benefit of this 
reservation 
does not accrue to that category.” 


Vijay Kumar, a Chennai-based advocate working in the disabilities sector, adds 
another perspective: ” On analysing the law, in the legal aspect, the 
Disabilities Act has completely left out the private sector, except for the 
incentives. In the long run, an amendment should be made for bringing the 
private sector under the purview of the disabilities law.” 


” The notification for the civil service examination in May 2004 has appeared 
recently in the newspapers. The Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) has, for 
the last few years, been providing facilities for disabled people to write 
their 
exams, by providing accessible centres and scribes,” says Poonam Natarajan, 
founder-chairperson of Vidya Sagar. ” The UPSC has also increased the number of 
exam centres from one to six for visually impaired candidates. However, these 
facilities have no meaning for bright, intelligent, disabled people if they are 
eventually going to be rejected from the civil services on account of their 
disability.” 


Javed Abidi explains: ” If a visually impaired person wishes to write these 
exams, which are legendarily tough, she/he would not only have to put in the 
effort that is normally required to study for such a difficult exam, but would 
also have to put in the extra effort to travel to the centre and deal with 
her/his allotted writer. The issue we are raising here is that after managing 
all the hardships, if the person clears the exam she/he will not be allotted 
any 
of the civil services, as these have not been ‘identified’ for visually 
impaired 
persons. This is nothing but a practical joke being played on the disabled!” 


Ironically, the Indian Administrative Service (IAS) already employs officers 
with disabilities in senior positions, like secretary and joint secretary. 
These 
persons entered the services before the Disability Act was passed. Activists 
point out that the present defence secretary to the Government of India, listed 
as disabled from polio, joined the IAS in 1969 as a general (unreserved/open) 
candidate. In another instance, Sonal Mishra of the Gujarat cadre, who secured 
admission in the open category, was first rejected from all the services due to 
her abnormally low vision but was taken into the IAS after four months on the 
instructions of a special committee.

The National Disability Network, initiated by the NCPEDP, has petitioned deputy 
prime minister L K Advani to look into the matter urgently and work out a clear 
policy with regard to the issue.

Some cases of discrimination in the civil services:

Rigzin Sampheal, an orthopaedically disabled candidate, got a second rank in 
the 
scheduled tribes (ST) category and qualified in the Civil Services Examination 
(CSE) of 2002. He has been allotted the Indian Information Service instead of 
the Indian Administrative Service. According to a notification issued by the 
Government of India, the first six rankings in the ST category are reserved for 
the IAS. Sampheal, who is presently undergoing training for the IIS, is still 
waiting for a reason for being discriminated against.

Lokesh Kumar, also orthopaedically disabled, came ninth in the SC category and 
qualified for the CSE of 2002. According to a notification issued by the 
Government of India, the first 10 rankings in the SC category are reserved for 
the IAS. However, Kumar too is slated to be an officer of the IIS.

M Sathish, an orthopaedically disabled person who came 30th in the SC category 
and qualified in the CSE of 2002, has not been allocated any of the services so 
far, for want of vacancies in the ‘identified posts’ for the physically 
disabled 
category. Candidates with lower ranks are presently undergoing training.

Ravi Kumar Arora, who has low vision, took the CSE of 2002. He got a ranking of 
325. He was rejected on grounds of his ‘sub-standard vision’. When he appealed 
that his case be considered under the disabled category the DoPT claimed that 
“none of the vacancies notified was earmarked for visually impaired 
candidates”. 
Arora is keen to appear in the CSE of 2004 but wonders if he is “running for a 
target that exists nowhere”.

Ulaganathan, who is orthopaedically disabled, wrote the CSE in 2001. He got a 
ranking of 261 and was entitled for entry into the Indian Revenue Service. But 
he was allotted the IIS instead. Candidates with lower marks were allocated 
high-ranking services. Ulaganathan filed a case before the central 
administrative tribunal which ruled that this was a clear case of ‘hostile 
discrimination’. No positive action has yet been taken.

Day by Day The situvation is going totaly out of our hands.

Thanks and regards

Ambika



To unsubscribe send a message to
accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in
with the subject unsubscribe.

To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please 
visit the list home page at
http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in

To unsubscribe send a message to
accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in
with the subject unsubscribe.

To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please 
visit the list home page at
http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in

  • [AI] AI:IAS ambika
    • Re: [AI] AI:IAS amruthreddy kasarla

Reply via email to