Dear friends,

Forwarding a mail which is relevant to all who work with focus on women with
disabilities. Regards

Shampa Sengupta

Sruti Disability Rights Centre

Kolkata

Friends,

Please find below are the new guidelines on female sterilization adopted
by the International Federation on Gynecology and Obstetrics. The new
guidelines recognize the particular vulnerability of some groups, including
women with disabilities, and make specific references to the CRPD!


The guidelines articulate that only women themselves - not family members or
legal guardians - can give ethically valid consent to their own
sterilization. The recommendations include that "No woman may be sterilized
without her own, previously-given informed consent, with no coercion,
pressure or undue inducement by healthcare providers or institutions."


This can be very useful for our advocacy - please feel free to share with
others.


Best

Shantha




*International Federation of Gynecology and
Obstetrics[1]<https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&view=bsp&ver=ohhl4rw8mbn4#13093a5b7c95c9a6__ftn1>
*

*Executive Board Meeting***

*Adopted June 2011*

* *

*Female contraceptive sterilization*

*FEMALE CONTRACEPTIVE STERILIZATION*

*Background*

1. Human rights include the right of individuals to control and decide on
matters of their own sexuality and reproductive health, free from coercion,
discrimination and violence. This includes the right to decide whether and
when to have children, and the means to exercise this right.



2. Surgical sterilization is a widely used method of contraception. An
ethical requirement is that performance be preceded by the patient‘s
informed and freely given consent, obtained in compliance with the
Guidelines Regarding Informed Consent (2007) and on Confidentiality (2005).
Information for consent includes, for instance, that sterilization should be
considered irreversible, that alternatives exist such as reversible forms of
family planning, that life circumstances may change, causing a person later
to regret consenting to sterilization, and that procedures have a very low
but significant failure rate.



3. Methods of sterilization generally include tubal ligation or other
methods of tubal occlusion. Hysterectomy is inappropriate solely for
sterilization, because of disproportionate risks and costs.



4. Once an informed choice has been freely made, barriers to surgical
sterilization should be minimised. In particular: a) sterilization should be
made available to any person of adult age; b) no minimum or maximum number
of children may be used as a criterion for access; c) a partner‘s consent
must not be required, although patients should be encouraged to include
their partners in counseling; d) physicians whose beliefs oppose
participation in sterilization should comply with the Ethical Guidelines on
Conscientious Objection (2005).



5. Evidence exists, including by governmental admission and apology, of a
long history of forced and otherwise non-consensual sterilizations of women,
including Roma women in Europe and women with disabilities. Reports have
documented the coerced sterilization of women living with HIV/AIDS in Africa
and Latin America. Fears remain that ethnic and racial minority,
HIV-positive, low-income and drug-using women, women with disabilities and
other vulnerable women around the world, are still being sterilized without
their own freely-given, adequately informed consent.



6. Medical practitioners must recognize that, under human rights provisions
and their own professional codes of conduct, it is unethical and in
violation of human rights for them to perform procedures for prevention of
future pregnancy on women who have not freely requested such procedures, or
who have not previously given their free and informed consent. This is so
even if such procedures are recommended as being in the women‘s own health
interests.



7. Only women themselves can give ethically valid consent to their own
sterilization. Family members including husbands, parents, legal guardians,
medical practitioners and, for instance, government or other public
officers, cannot consent on any woman‘s or girl‘s behalf.



8. Women‘s consent to sterilization should not be made a condition of access
to medical care, such as HIV/ AIDS treatment, natural or cesarean delivery,
or abortion, or of any benefit such as medical insurance, social assistance,
employment or release from an institution. In addition, consent to
sterilization should not be requested when women may be vulnerable, such as
when requesting termination of pregnancy, going into labor or in the
aftermath of delivery.



9. Further, it is unethical for medical practitioners to perform
sterilization procedures within a government program or strategy that does
not include voluntary consent to sterilization.



10. Sterilization for prevention of future pregnancy cannot be ethically
justified on grounds of medical emergency. Even if a future pregnancy may
endanger a woman‘s life or health, she will not become pregnant immediately,
and therefore must be given the time and support she needs to consider her
choice. Her informed decision must be respected, even if it is considered
liable to be harmful to her health.



11. As for all non-emergency medical procedures, women should be adequately
informed of the risks and benefits of any proposed procedure and of its
alternatives. It must be explained that sterilization must be considered a
permanent, irreversible procedure that prevents future pregnancy, and that
non-permanent alternative treatments exist. It must also be emphasized that
sterilization does not provide protection from sexually transmitted
infections. Women must be advised about and offered follow-up examinations
and care after any procedure they accept.



12. All information must be provided in language, both spoken and written,
that the women understand, and in an accessible format such as sign
language, Braille and plain, non-technical language appropriate to the
individual woman‘s needs. The physician performing sterilization has the
responsibility of ensuring that the patient has been properly counseled
regarding the risks and benefits of the procedure and its alternatives.



13. The U.N. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities includes
recognition “that women and girls with disabilities are often at greater
risk … of violence, injury or abuse, neglect or negligent treatment,
maltreatment or exploitation”. Accordingly, Article 23(1) imposes the duty
“to eliminate discrimination against persons with disabilities in all
matters relating to marriage, family, parenthood and relationships, on an
equal basis with others, so as to ensure that:

a) The right of all persons with disabilities who are of marriageable age to
marry and to found a family … is recognized;

b) The rights…to decide freely and responsibly on the number and spacing of
their children …are recognized, and the means necessary to enable them to
exercise these rights are provided;

c) Persons with disabilities, including children, retain their fertility on
an equal basis with others”.



*Recommendations*

1. No woman may be sterilized without her own, previously-given informed
consent, with no coercion, pressure or undue inducement by healthcare
providers or institutions.



2. Women considering sterilization must be given information of their
options in the language in which they communicate and understand, through
translation if necessary, in an accessible format and plain, non-technical
language appropriate to the individual woman‘s needs. Women should also be
provided with information on non-permanent options for contraception.
Misconceptions about prevention of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs)
including HIV by sterilization need to be addressed with appropriate
counseling about STDs.



3. Sterilization for prevention of future pregnancy is not an emergency
procedure. It does not justify departure from the general principles of free
and informed consent. Therefore, the needs of each woman must be
accommodated, including being given the time and support she needs, while
not under pressure, in pain, or dependent on medical care, to consider the
explanation she has received of what permanent sterilization entails and to
make her choice known.



4. Consent to sterilization must not be made a condition of receipt of any
other medical care, such as HIV/AIDS treatment, assistance in natural or
cesarean delivery, medical termination of pregnancy, or of any benefit such
as employment, release from an institution, public or private medical
insurance, or social assistance.



5. Forced sterilization constitutes an act of violence, whether committed by
individual practitioners or under institutional or governmental policies.
Healthcare providers have an ethical response in accordance with the
guideline on Violence Against Women (2007).



6. It is ethically inappropriate for healthcare providers to initiate
judicial proceedings for sterilization of their patients, or to be witnesses
in such proceedings inconsistently with Article 23(1) of the Convention on
the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.



7. At a public policy level, the medical profession has a duty to be a voice
of reason and compassion, pointing out when legislative, regulatory or legal
measures interfere with personal choice and appropriate medical care.



*Goa, March 2011*

------------------------------

[1]<https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&view=bsp&ver=ohhl4rw8mbn4#13093a5b7c95c9a6__ftnref>
 The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) is the
only worldwide organisation that groups obstetricians and gynecologists. It
hasmember associations <http://www.figo.org/members> in 124
countries/territories. Its Secretariat <http://www.figo.org/about/sec> is
based in London, the UK. FIGO’s mission <http://www.figo.org/about/mission> is
to promote the wellbeing of women and to raise the standards of practice in
obstetrics and gynecology. http://www.figo.org/about


__________________________________________________
Ms. Shantha Rau Barriga
Researcher/Advocate on Disability Rights
Human Rights Watch
350 5th Avenue, 34th Floor
New York, NY 10118
Tel: +1 (212) 216-1823
Fax: +1 (212) 736-1300
Email: [email protected]
www.hrw.org

__._,_.___
Search for old postings at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

To unsubscribe send a message to
[email protected]
with the subject unsubscribe.

To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please 
visit the list home page at
http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in

Reply via email to