dont send in future any mail regardind any thing
________________________________ From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Thu, June 16, 2011 2:43:44 PM Subject: AccessIndia Digest, Vol 56, Issue 746 Send AccessIndia mailing list submissions to [email protected] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [email protected] You can reach the person managing the list at [email protected] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of AccessIndia digest..." Please do not reply to this digest mail. You should put your comments into a new mail with appropriate subject line. _______________________________________________ AccessIndia mailing list [email protected] http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Today's Topics: 1. Re: How to give a password to file and folder (mukesh jain) 2. Re: good morning access indians i am sanjay jadhav and i am a lecturer in department of law unversity of mumbai and i am sending some article on point of disability kindly give your opinion (Asudani, Rajesh) 3. Re: new guidelines on female sterilization (Asudani, Rajesh) 4. good after noon (shahanshah khan) 5. huy (shahanshah khan) 6. huy (shahanshah khan) 7. Rajastan footwere (Ravi Gawai) 8. Job alert, suitable for locomotive disabled (Kotian, H P) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:54:55 +0530 From: mukesh jain <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AI] How to give a password to file and folder Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 hello, does anyone has this software? if yes, please upload the same. On 6/16/11, shankar shan <[email protected]> wrote: > not only folder you can protect whole drive from folder gard > > On 6/15/11, Neelima Surve <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hello All, >> Hope All is Well. >> >> You cannot give the password to your folder. You can assign permision >> for your folder or you can use folder guard to secure your folder.with >> the help of this software you can protect your folder. >> >> -- >> God examine those whom loves he the most. >> >> Search for old postings at: >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ >> >> To unsubscribe send a message to >> [email protected] >> with the subject unsubscribe. >> >> To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, >> please >> visit the list home page at >> http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in >> >> > > > -- > email: [email protected] > > MSN: [email protected] > > mobile: +919591846442 > > Search for old postings at: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > > To unsubscribe send a message to > [email protected] > with the subject unsubscribe. > > To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please > visit the list home page at > http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in > > -- Regards, Mukesh jain Email: [email protected] Skype: mukeshja Mob: 09977165123 "Face your deficiencies and acknowledge them; but do not let them master you. Let them teach you patience, sweetness, insight. " Helen Keller ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:45:50 +0530 From: "Asudani, Rajesh" <[email protected]> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [AI] good morning access indians i am sanjay jadhav and i am a lecturer in department of law unversity of mumbai and i am sending some article on point of disability kindly give your opinion Message-ID: <bea8645838d62348ae206f49353e047d0267825...@rbiexch01.rbi1.rbi.org.in> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Dear Sanjay Your article, I am afraid, tries to discuss status of right to judicial remedy, and says nothing on disability specifically. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of sanjay jadhav Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 10:35 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [AI] good morning access indians i am sanjay jadhav and i am a lecturer in department of law unversity of mumbai and i am sending some article on point of disability kindly give your opinion The question as to whether the access to justice is a constitutional right, a statutory right or a common law right was debated in different jurisdiction in different manner. Whereas the Supreme Court of India in Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Shareholders Welfare Assn. (2) v. S.C. Sekar reported in (2009) 2 SCC 784 has held that access to justice is a human right which in certain situations, may also be considered to be a fundamental right, the question with regard to the constitutional aspect of the matter vis-?-vis the power of judicial review had been considered in many cases. In Arunima Baruah v. Union of India, reported in (2007) 6 SCC 120, it was held that"On the one hand, judicial review is a basic feature of the Constitution, on the other, it provides for a discretionary remedy. Access to justice is a human right. A person who has a grievance against a State, a forum must be provided for redressal thereof. (See Hatton vs United Kingdom. For reference see also Zee Telefilms Ltd. v. Union of India.) The evolution of the law in this behalf although sporadic but on a positive note. The judiciary acts as a defender of individual liberties wherever a person raises a concern with regard to violation or protection of his right, the Court shall step in. Even an accused, be terrorist or otherwise has the right to approach the court of law. In R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Leech reported in [1994] Q.B. 198, Steyn LJ said ''It is a principle of our law that every citizen has a right of unimpeded access to a court''. Further in Raymond v Honey [1983] 1 AC 1, Lord Wilberforce at described the right of access to the courts as a ''constitutional right''. Laws, J in R v The Lord Chancellor, ex p Witham, [1997] 2 All ER 779 after discussing various decisions including Ex parte Leech (supra) equated the right to access to justice to the right of speech and expression in the following words: ''I cannot think that the right of access to justice is in some way a lesser right than that of free expression; the circumstances in which free speech might justifiably be curtailed in my view run wider than any in which the citizen might properly be prevented by the State from seeking redress from the Queen's courts. Indeed, the right to a fair trial, which of necessity imports the right of access to the court, is as near to an absolute right as any which I can envisage''. Laws, J referred to the proposition that: ''The executive cannot in law abrogate the right of access to justice, unless it is specifically so permitted by Parliament; and this is the meaning of the constitutional right''. It was furthermore held that ''access of right to a court is a constitutional right'', which can only be denied by a specific legislation ''turning people away from the court door''. The head note of this decision uses this term common law constitutional right. In an article Dr. Cyrus Dass, a member of Faculty of Law University of Malaya published in ''World of All Human Rights'' Soli J. Sorabji a Festschrift, opined that the same may safely be taken as an accurate compendious description of the right. From: SANJAY VASANT JADHAV Lecturer in department of law University of Mumbai Date: 15.6.2011. Mobile number 9892505106 Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ To unsubscribe send a message to [email protected] with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Notice: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, review, distribution, printing or copying of the information contained in this e-mail message and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If you have received this email by error, please notify us by return e-mail or telephone and immediately and permanently delete the message and any attachments. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The Reserve Bank of India accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:17:06 +0530 From: "Asudani, Rajesh" <[email protected]> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [AI] new guidelines on female sterilization Message-ID: <bea8645838d62348ae206f49353e047d0267825...@rbiexch01.rbi1.rbi.org.in> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" In all such documents, we tend to equate disability with sensory or physical disability, and consequently, we fail to provide for cases where a person is gravely intellectually or mentally impaired. Proponents of disability rights fallaciously apply all the criteria of sensory and physical disability to mental and intellectual disability, which is not appropriate. I comprehend that many times, intellectual or mental disability is socially constructed without any objective criteria of normalcy and deviation, but it is not always true, and we must provide for such cases... Whatever parameters of normalcy and psychological health or impairment or deviation we may have adopted may be arbitrary, but they are not ultimately pointless. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sruti disAbility Rights Centre Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 10:44 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [AI] new guidelines on female sterilization Dear friends, Forwarding a mail which is relevant to all who work with focus on women with disabilities. Regards Shampa Sengupta Sruti Disability Rights Centre Kolkata Friends, Please find below are the new guidelines on female sterilization adopted by the International Federation on Gynecology and Obstetrics. The new guidelines recognize the particular vulnerability of some groups, including women with disabilities, and make specific references to the CRPD! The guidelines articulate that only women themselves - not family members or legal guardians - can give ethically valid consent to their own sterilization. The recommendations include that "No woman may be sterilized without her own, previously-given informed consent, with no coercion, pressure or undue inducement by healthcare providers or institutions." This can be very useful for our advocacy - please feel free to share with others. Best Shantha *International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics[1]<https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&view=bsp&ver=ohhl4rw8mbn4#13093a5b7c95c9a6__ftn1> * *Executive Board Meeting*** *Adopted June 2011* * * *Female contraceptive sterilization* *FEMALE CONTRACEPTIVE STERILIZATION* *Background* 1. Human rights include the right of individuals to control and decide on matters of their own sexuality and reproductive health, free from coercion, discrimination and violence. This includes the right to decide whether and when to have children, and the means to exercise this right. 2. Surgical sterilization is a widely used method of contraception. An ethical requirement is that performance be preceded by the patient's informed and freely given consent, obtained in compliance with the Guidelines Regarding Informed Consent (2007) and on Confidentiality (2005). Information for consent includes, for instance, that sterilization should be considered irreversible, that alternatives exist such as reversible forms of family planning, that life circumstances may change, causing a person later to regret consenting to sterilization, and that procedures have a very low but significant failure rate. 3. Methods of sterilization generally include tubal ligation or other methods of tubal occlusion. Hysterectomy is inappropriate solely for sterilization, because of disproportionate risks and costs. 4. Once an informed choice has been freely made, barriers to surgical sterilization should be minimised. In particular: a) sterilization should be made available to any person of adult age; b) no minimum or maximum number of children may be used as a criterion for access; c) a partner's consent must not be required, although patients should be encouraged to include their partners in counseling; d) physicians whose beliefs oppose participation in sterilization should comply with the Ethical Guidelines on Conscientious Objection (2005). 5. Evidence exists, including by governmental admission and apology, of a long history of forced and otherwise non-consensual sterilizations of women, including Roma women in Europe and women with disabilities. Reports have documented the coerced sterilization of women living with HIV/AIDS in Africa and Latin America. Fears remain that ethnic and racial minority, HIV-positive, low-income and drug-using women, women with disabilities and other vulnerable women around the world, are still being sterilized without their own freely-given, adequately informed consent. 6. Medical practitioners must recognize that, under human rights provisions and their own professional codes of conduct, it is unethical and in violation of human rights for them to perform procedures for prevention of future pregnancy on women who have not freely requested such procedures, or who have not previously given their free and informed consent. This is so even if such procedures are recommended as being in the women's own health interests. 7. Only women themselves can give ethically valid consent to their own sterilization. Family members including husbands, parents, legal guardians, medical practitioners and, for instance, government or other public officers, cannot consent on any woman's or girl's behalf. 8. Women's consent to sterilization should not be made a condition of access to medical care, such as HIV/ AIDS treatment, natural or cesarean delivery, or abortion, or of any benefit such as medical insurance, social assistance, employment or release from an institution. In addition, consent to sterilization should not be requested when women may be vulnerable, such as when requesting termination of pregnancy, going into labor or in the aftermath of delivery. 9. Further, it is unethical for medical practitioners to perform sterilization procedures within a government program or strategy that does not include voluntary consent to sterilization. 10. Sterilization for prevention of future pregnancy cannot be ethically justified on grounds of medical emergency. Even if a future pregnancy may endanger a woman's life or health, she will not become pregnant immediately, and therefore must be given the time and support she needs to consider her choice. Her informed decision must be respected, even if it is considered liable to be harmful to her health. 11. As for all non-emergency medical procedures, women should be adequately informed of the risks and benefits of any proposed procedure and of its alternatives. It must be explained that sterilization must be considered a permanent, irreversible procedure that prevents future pregnancy, and that non-permanent alternative treatments exist. It must also be emphasized that sterilization does not provide protection from sexually transmitted infections. Women must be advised about and offered follow-up examinations and care after any procedure they accept. 12. All information must be provided in language, both spoken and written, that the women understand, and in an accessible format such as sign language, Braille and plain, non-technical language appropriate to the individual woman's needs. The physician performing sterilization has the responsibility of ensuring that the patient has been properly counseled regarding the risks and benefits of the procedure and its alternatives. 13. The U.N. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities includes recognition "that women and girls with disabilities are often at greater risk ... of violence, injury or abuse, neglect or negligent treatment, maltreatment or exploitation". Accordingly, Article 23(1) imposes the duty "to eliminate discrimination against persons with disabilities in all matters relating to marriage, family, parenthood and relationships, on an equal basis with others, so as to ensure that: a) The right of all persons with disabilities who are of marriageable age to marry and to found a family ... is recognized; b) The rights...to decide freely and responsibly on the number and spacing of their children ...are recognized, and the means necessary to enable them to exercise these rights are provided; c) Persons with disabilities, including children, retain their fertility on an equal basis with others". *Recommendations* 1. No woman may be sterilized without her own, previously-given informed consent, with no coercion, pressure or undue inducement by healthcare providers or institutions. 2. Women considering sterilization must be given information of their options in the language in which they communicate and understand, through translation if necessary, in an accessible format and plain, non-technical language appropriate to the individual woman's needs. Women should also be provided with information on non-permanent options for contraception. Misconceptions about prevention of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) including HIV by sterilization need to be addressed with appropriate counseling about STDs. 3. Sterilization for prevention of future pregnancy is not an emergency procedure. It does not justify departure from the general principles of free and informed consent. Therefore, the needs of each woman must be accommodated, including being given the time and support she needs, while not under pressure, in pain, or dependent on medical care, to consider the explanation she has received of what permanent sterilization entails and to make her choice known. 4. Consent to sterilization must not be made a condition of receipt of any other medical care, such as HIV/AIDS treatment, assistance in natural or cesarean delivery, medical termination of pregnancy, or of any benefit such as employment, release from an institution, public or private medical insurance, or social assistance. 5. Forced sterilization constitutes an act of violence, whether committed by individual practitioners or under institutional or governmental policies. Healthcare providers have an ethical response in accordance with the guideline on Violence Against Women (2007). 6. It is ethically inappropriate for healthcare providers to initiate judicial proceedings for sterilization of their patients, or to be witnesses in such proceedings inconsistently with Article 23(1) of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. 7. At a public policy level, the medical profession has a duty to be a voice of reason and compassion, pointing out when legislative, regulatory or legal measures interfere with personal choice and appropriate medical care. *Goa, March 2011* ------------------------------ [1]<https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&view=bsp&ver=ohhl4rw8mbn4#13093a5b7c95c9a6__ftnref> The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) is the only worldwide organisation that groups obstetricians and gynecologists. It hasmember associations <http://www.figo.org/members> in 124 countries/territories. Its Secretariat <http://www.figo.org/about/sec> is based in London, the UK. FIGO's mission <http://www.figo.org/about/mission> is to promote the wellbeing of women and to raise the standards of practice in obstetrics and gynecology. http://www.figo.org/about __________________________________________________ Ms. Shantha Rau Barriga Researcher/Advocate on Disability Rights Human Rights Watch 350 5th Avenue, 34th Floor New York, NY 10118 Tel: +1 (212) 216-1823 Fax: +1 (212) 736-1300 Email: [email protected] www.hrw.org __._,_.___ Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ To unsubscribe send a message to [email protected] with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Notice: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, review, distribution, printing or copying of the information contained in this e-mail message and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If you have received this email by error, please notify us by return e-mail or telephone and immediately and permanently delete the message and any attachments. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The Reserve Bank of India accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:27:05 +0300 From: shahanshah khan <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Subject: [AI] good after noon Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 my name is shahanshah alam i belong from jharkhand i am doing inter mediate i am totaly blind ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:37:28 +0300 From: shahanshah khan <[email protected]> To: accessindia <[email protected]> Subject: [AI] huy Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 my name is shahanshah alam i belong from jharkhand i am doing inter mediate i am totaly blind ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:48:26 +0300 From: shahanshah khan <[email protected]> To: accessindia <[email protected]> Subject: [AI] huy Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 my name is shahanshah alam i belong from jharkhand i am doing inter mediate i amtotaly blind ------------------------------ Message: 7 Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 01:55:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Ravi Gawai <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Subject: [AI] Rajastan footwere Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hallo friends! We want information about rajastan footwere a centre for handicaped person, in forms of their address, contact numbers and their services. Waiting regards! Ravie gawai leave the life before life leaves you ------------------------------ Message: 8 Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:43:37 +0530 From: "Kotian, H P" <[email protected]> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: [AI] Job alert, suitable for locomotive disabled Message-ID: <bea8645838d62348ae206f49353e047d0267825...@rbiexch01.rbi1.rbi.org.in> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Top Indian credit card company has following immediate vacancy : Role : Customer Service Associate Location : Gurgoan Job Description: 1. Receiving calls from the customers and answering the queries 2. Up- selling the products while receiving the calls from the customer 3. Maintain Average Call Handling Time and Call Quality Skillset Required: Excellent Communication Skills in English Desired : Should have 0-3 years of experience in telesales. Work ONLY 5 days a week - no night shift for the female candidates. For Male candidates, they would have only 4-6 days night shift in a month. Company provided cabs and buses for pickup and drop CTC: CTC: 1.3 Lacs per annum for freshers Max CTC: 1.8 Lacs per annum Education: Minimum Graduation from recognized university( Non MBA/Non Technical) Only Orthopaedically handicapped candidates would be suitable for the role Suitable candidates should send their profiles immediately to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Thanks -- Regards Anubhuti ________________________________ Notice: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, review, distribution, printing or copying of the information contained in this e-mail message and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If you have received this email by error, please notify us by return e-mail or telephone and immediately and permanently delete the message and any attachments. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The Reserve Bank of India accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. End of AccessIndia Digest, Vol 56, Issue 746 ******************************************** Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ To unsubscribe send a message to [email protected] with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
