sourse : http://ugcnetonline.in/notification.php
ii) For Visually Handicapped (VH) candidates thirty minutes’ extra time shall be provided separately for paper-I and Paper-II. For paper-III, forty five minutes’ extra time shall be provided. They will also be provided the services of a scribe who would be a graduate in a subject other than that of the candidate. Those Physically Handicapped (PH) candidates who are not in a position to write in their own hand-writing can also avail these services by making prior request (at least one week before the date of UGC-NET) in writing to the Co-ordinator of the test centre. Extra time and facility of scribe would not be provided to other Physically Handicapped candidates. On 8/12/11, Asudani, Rajesh <[email protected]> wrote: > Well, > The representation was good. > Anyway, does anybody have exact guidelines of UGC about writer? > As far as I think, they state that scribe has to be a graduate but from a > different stream. > So, if they are so, and only if we are permitted to bring our own scribe > complying with guidelines, it would solve the problem. > Me thinks no authority can preclude from bringing our own scribe fulfilling > layed down guidelines. > > They are doing so, by perversely interpreting section 31 of PWD act. > Amit, this is one more point for petition. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Shona Man > Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 1:33 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [AI] Posting the UGC representation regarding scribe for > further discussion. > > Hi guys, before last December exam we (visually challanged students > from JNU) also presented and submitted an application to UGC chairman > personally. He asured us to follow up the causes. In this application > we discussed some other issues also apart from the qualification and > eligibility of the scribe, such as allocation of centres at well known > and easely accessible places. > What I experienced out of our excersise that this peace of paper > containing genuin demands doesn't has much value before their high > esteemed office and according to them its as good as mercy upon us if > they do it. But its our constitutional right to be treated equally. > Friends in last exam (June 2011) activities prejudice to the blind > examinies were taken place, nevertheless we are unable to do much. Its > good that we are going again with this peace of paper which has > undermining values before them, however I am positive this time since > last chairman has already left the office. But if we don't find the > optimum solution of our problem this time then we should adopt other > course of action to curve this anomaly. > > Friends for ready reference I am pasting here the text of the > application which we presented to UGC chairman in last November. > > To > > Chairman > University Grants Commission > Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg New Delhi > > Subject: Application for review and amendment the rules regarding > appointment of writer for blind candidate in UGC Net Exam > > Honorable Sir May it be Your Worship Please > > On behalf of Visually Challenged Forum Jawaharlal Nehru University, I > have honor to beseech before your credited office in order to > accomplish the application for your kind consideration regarding the > subject mentioned above. > We the visually challenged candidates appearing in UGC Net exam have > been facing various problems for years regarding the appointment of > the writers by the respective centers, to the blind students for the > purpose of the said exam. > There are some UGC guidelines regarding the appointment of the writer > for the blind candidate however many centers particularly in Delhi > don't take care to adhere these responsibility strictly . The writers > who are appointed for the purpose of Net Exam are not appointed as per > their ability to read and write in concern medium of examination hence > the writers are sometime not qualified even to read the questions and > write the answers correctly and fluently as dictated by the candidate. > Pertaining to this can of worms many of our blind candidates have not > been ensued to score upto the level of qualifying marks to pass Net > exam, somewhere this problem have discern of infringement of human > rights. > > More over the candidate are not allowed to arrange their own writer on > the same academic requirements as per UGC guidelines. > Therefore in order to find a suitable determination we the Visually > Challenged Forum J.N.U earnestly request you to kindly consider the > following exigencies: > > * UGC should review and amend the existing rules regarding the > employment of the writers for blind candidates at the time of Net > examination. > * Respective centers be directed to conduct replica test of writer > before one or two days of exam of reading and writing in concern > medium in which he/she is to perform as writer for the concern > candidate, so that the efficient and qualified writers able to read > and write correctly would be employed for this purpose. > * There should be an option for the candidate to arrange his/her own > writer qualifying the UGC guidelines on the basis of same academic > requirements. > * In reference to Delhi some time the exam centers are too far and at > unheard-of places which are highly inaccessible for a blind candidate > to reach easily, therefore we request the commission to allot the > exam centers for blind candidate at well known and easily accessible > venues. > * The above problems are annoying and intolerable therefore we want > effective and practical solution for all discussed problems and also > the remedies which the commission thinks fit in favor of the blind > candidates. > > * The UGC guidelines for appointment of writer should be in public > domain appended with the UGC Net exam notification. > > I will be highly thankful to you for your kind consideration upon > above problems and their effective solution. > > Thanking You > Convener JNU visually Challanged Forum > on Behalf of other visually challanged students JNU > COPY to > 1.President of India > 2. Office of Prime Minister > 3. Chairman National Human right Commission > 4. Chief Justice of India > 5. Chief Commissioner for Persons With Disability Govt of India > 6. Minister in Charge Human Resources and Development Govt of India > > > On 8/12/11, Prashant Verma <[email protected]> wrote: >> What is your view on the following arrangement: >> >> "There should be no clause regarding the academic qualification of the >> scribe except a minimum level of education. As each candidate is required >> to >> be assigned a separate invigilator and a separate room, it is the >> responsibility of the invigilator to ensure a fair conduct of the >> examination. As far as possible, students should be provided writers from >> the same stream e.g. students of humanities should preferably be provided >> with scribes of humanities background and those of science and commerce >> and >> different languages with scribes of respective backgrounds. >> >> All students may arrange for their own writers, scribes. In case they are >> unable to do so, the superintendent of the examination centre would >> provide >> a writer. The candidate must, however, request for a writer at least 24 >> hours prior to the commencement of the examination. A writers' bank must >> be >> created for the purpose for a ready availability of writers whenever >> required. The candidate must be given an opportunity to satisfy himself/ >> herself about the writer's ability to take dictation from the candidate. >> There should be, at least, a minimum comfort level between the candidate >> and >> the writer and the invigilator." >> >> Note that this clause poses no limits on age, percentage marks and stream >> of >> study. In fact it recommends a minimum level of education and writers from >> the same stream as the student. >> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rohiet A. >> Patil >> Sent: 12 August 2011 00:44 >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [AI] Posting the UGC representation regarding scribe for >> further discussion. >> >> Hi! I also agree with amit's and Prakash's view. I fail to understand what >> should be the problem in taking the scribe from the same streem? Further, >> I >> don't see any logic regarding the clause of age limit. >> Thanks and regards, >> Rohiet >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Amit Bhatt" <[email protected]> >> To: <[email protected]> >> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2011 3:38 PM >> Subject: Re: [AI] Posting the UGC representation regarding scribe for >> further discussion. >> >> >> Dear Akhilesh, >> >> Please do not take it otherwise but factually the proposed clause of age >> of >> the Scribe is a superfluous. >> See, today there is no age criteria set for those who want to pursue their >> Education. People are even doing their Masters and Graduation in the age >> of >> 35, 40 and so on. In this scenario how can we put the age criteria for >> someone? >> Secondly, we are the real and original Examinee, not our Scribe. So we can >> be restricted with the age norms, but not the person who is writing for >> us. >> Let's not try to propose or fraim out such rules which are tend to be >> challenged later by someone. >> Also, the question raised by Mr. Prakash has a valid point. This is why I >> have already shown my disagreement with the point of allowing Writers of >> the >> same stream in case the Examinee is from Music or Sanskrit only. Every >> Course or Subject has one or the other technical term to write on the >> Examinations and Computer Science, Mathematics and Electronic cannot be >> ignored here. Even though the subjective examination has some terms and >> terminology almost for every course or stream. Therefore, the Scribe can >> be >> obtained from whatever stream for any Exam. >> Since every subject or study has the specific terminology as I've >> mentioned >> above, remember, putting two different conditions in accordance with the >> Subject Stream for one Exam can be challenged on the strong grounds of >> impartiality in the future. >> Hope you people would analyze your draft (proposal) from every aspect for >> it's evenhandedness before presenting to the concern officials. >> >> Thank you for refining some words in your letter. >> Regards, >> >> Amit Bhatt >> >> On 8/11/11, akhilesh <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hello to all, >>> I posted the below draft under the different subject line initiated by >>> mr. Amit. I thought that it needs its unique subject line so I'm >>> posting here the revised draft on the bases of the suggestions given >>> by Rajesh sir, Amit ji, and MR. Harsh Negi. for further discussion and >>> suggestions. >>> ============ >>> Dated: 05.07.2011 >>> >>> To, >>> The chairman University Grant Commission, Bahadur shah zafar marg >>> Delhi, Delhi - 110002 >>> >>> Sub: Regarding the Problem of Scribe of Visually-challenged aspirants >>> In UGC Net >>> Exams. >>> >>> Sir, >>> With great sorrow and regret, we, the persons belonging to the >>> visually-challenged community would like to draw your attention on the >>> following points: >>> >>> 1. That the most of the times we are being provided the >>> incompetent/ineligible/careless scribe during the UGC NET examination, >>> and this very fact deprives us to solve even half of the question >>> paper, regardless of the fact that one has worked hard and knows all >>> the answers well. >>> 2. For your kind consideration, Carelessness and misfeasance committed >>> by the authorities appointed by UGC are being enumerated below, the >>> outcome of which can easily be assessed: >>> a. Hindi Medium candidates are being provided the English Medium >>> scribe, and on the other hand, English medium candidates Hindi medium >>> scribe; b. In most of the cases, Sanskrit medium students have failed >>> even to solve the single question as the scribe provided by the >>> concern examination centre was not able to read and write Sanskrit; c. >>> There Are large amount of cases, when the visually-challenged >>> candidates are forced to engage the clerical staff, and even in some >>> cases D grade employees, thereby destroying our each and every >>> possibilities of passing the NET exam; d. for Your consideration: >>> i. Clerical staff don't write our exam seriously, they keep themselves >>> busy in other official works; ii. A large amount of >>> visually-challenged candidates are English medium, and the capability >>> and ability to read and write English of clerical and D grade >>> employees would be known to you keeping in view the standard of NET >>> exam. >>> 3. Therefore, with great respect we propose that in any case, and >>> under any circumstances, the visually challenged candidates are not >>> willing to engage the scribe provided by the concern authorities, >>> under the currently enforced UGC rules and guidelines regarding the >>> scribe for the NET exam. >>> 4. We also propose that new guidelines regarding the scribe must be >>> issued as soon as possible so as to they could be come in effect prior >>> to the next UGC net exam which is about to be held likely in the month >>> of December 2011. >>> 5. Whereas, we propose that we are not willing to engage the scribe >>> provided by the concern authorities under the currently enforced UGC >>> rules and guidelines, we propose the following safeguards that may be >>> taken into consideration while allowing the candidate to engage his or >>> her own scribe in this connection: >>> a. The scribe should not be ELIGIBLE to appear for the NET exam and >>> should not have been so eligible for last three years,: Subject to the >>> conditions: >>> i. That The scribe must not be more than twenty-five years of age; ii. >>> That if the scribe is pursuing any undergraduate course, the scribe >>> must not be pursuing The similar course for which the candidate is >>> appearing. provided that, The candidates those who are appearing for >>> the Sanskrit and Music must essentially be allowed to engage the >>> scribe of the similar course, as no other person can write and read >>> Sanskrit well, keeping in view the standard of the UGC NET exam except >>> the person who is pursuing graduation in Sanskrit, and writing the >>> theory of music involves notes writing with special signs, which can >>> not be completed except by the person who knows it well. >>> b. At the examination hall a scribe must produce the following documents: >>> i. Original copy and photocopy of the Student I.D. card; >>> ii. Original copy and photocopy of the mark sheet of the >>> last exam passed; >>> iii. The mark sheet must clearly state the name of the examination and >>> the course as stated in student I.D. card; (I.E. both must be >>> co-related); iv. The original copy and photocopy of the age >>> certificate. >>> c. A person pursuing masters degree may also be allowed as a scribe, >>> subject to the condition that the scribe is not pursuing the similar >>> course for which the candidate is appearing for the UGC net exam. >>> 6. University wise list of the visually-challenged students and >>> candidates are attached with this application with their complete >>> names and their signatures and LTIs as the case may be. >>> >>> Kindly take the affirmative, concrete and quick action in this regard, >>> so that we can make right use of our studies and hard work, and could >>> play a vital role in the progress and prosperity of our >>> society by making our future better and bright. >>> >>> Thanking in anticipation, >>> Yours faithfully, >>> >>> All the visually-challenged students and candidates agreeing and >>> supporting the aforesaid points in its entirety. >>> >>> Copy to: >>> 1. Chief Commissioner For persons with disabilities; 2. secretary to >>> the ministry of Human resource development; 3. Secretary to the >>> ministry of social justice and empowerment. >>> >>> Search for old postings at: >>> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ >>> >>> To unsubscribe send a message to >>> [email protected] >>> with the subject unsubscribe. >>> >>> To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, >>> please visit the list home page at >>> http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org >>> .in >>> >>> >> >> Search for old postings at: >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ >> >> To unsubscribe send a message to >> [email protected] >> with the subject unsubscribe. >> >> To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, >> please >> visit the list home page at >> http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in >> >> >> >> Search for old postings at: >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ >> >> To unsubscribe send a message to >> [email protected] >> with the subject unsubscribe. >> >> To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, >> please >> visit the list home page at >> http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in >> >> >> >> Search for old postings at: >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ >> >> To unsubscribe send a message to >> [email protected] >> with the subject unsubscribe. >> >> To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, >> please >> visit the list home page at >> http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in >> >> > > > -- > Sonam Gupta, taking coaching for fassion designing > > Search for old postings at: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > > To unsubscribe send a message to > [email protected] > with the subject unsubscribe. > > To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please > visit the list home page at > http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in > > > Notice: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and > intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are > addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, > review, distribution, printing or copying of the information contained in > this e-mail message and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If you > have received this email by error, please notify us by return e-mail or > telephone and immediately and permanently delete the message and any > attachments. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for > the presence of viruses. The Reserve Bank of India accepts no liability for > any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. > > Search for old postings at: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > > To unsubscribe send a message to > [email protected] > with the subject unsubscribe. > > To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please > visit the list home page at > http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in > > Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ To unsubscribe send a message to [email protected] with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
