http://moneylife.in/article/making-the-railways-friendly-for-the-disabled-ndashpart-ii/24877.html


» life » public-interest »
making-the-railways-friendly-for-the-disabled-ndashpart-ii

Making the Railways friendly for the disabled –Part II
April 10, 2012 10:39 AM |
Sudhir Badami

If public transport system is not catering to the needs of disabled,
their livelihood is being denied. It is of utmost importance that the
Disability Act 1995 is implemented in letter and spirit. This is
concluding part of the two part series

Having looked at guidelines for making built environment barrier free
and the idea of relocating the compartment meant for PwD in the first
part, in the second and concluding part, we will see the issue of
large level differences between the coach floor levels and Platform
levels and how it can be tackled.

This brings us to the question of why the level differences are
inordinately high and why they cannot be minimized.



According to Indian Railways Schedule of Dimensions Revised 2004
(IR-SOD2004), for the wide stock passenger trains (Mumbai Suburban)
the level of the 3660 mm wide coach can be at 1345 mm in unloaded
condition above the top of rail (ToR) and 1200 mm when fully loaded.
This is valid for trains on steel springs belonging to older design.
The present set of Siemens design is on pneumatic suspension which
maintains the level at 1200 mm from ToR even with varying load.

The platform level to be constructed in accordance with IR-SOD2004 can
be within the range of 760 mm to 840 mm from ToR. This means that the
level difference between the coach floor and the station platform can
be in the range of 360 mm to 585 mm (14” to 24”). With coach floor
projecting 1830 mm (actually ~1780 mm) from the centerline of rails
and the edge of the platform coping at 1670 mm at the least, the
platform will be under the flooring with a maximum overlap of 110 mm.

The reality on ground is only partially true of things being in
accordance with the IR-SOD2004. Sometimes the horizontal overlap is
not only missing but small gap prevails. While the maximum vertical
floor level differences exist touching the worked out 585 mm, the
minimum difference is only as little as 100 mm as seen at Chunabhatti
or Thane, not as high as 350 mm worked out with IR-SOD2004. This means
that there is scope to seriously revisit the IR-SOD2004 in this
regard.

While it is noticed that the rail at stations do dip or rise
uniformly, visible to the eye clearly, as at Reay Road, and the
station platforms too should generally be at similar uniform gradient.
It is observed that the station platform level itself is not uniformly
horizontal along the edge lengthwise or rising or dipping to match the
rise or dip of tracks adjoining. Thus the level difference between the
coach floor and the station platform varies even along the same
platform edge for the same train.  This is very clear at Chunabhatti
and Andheri stations.

There are several stations located on the tracks which are on the
curve. It is assumed that the curve radius is within the norms
prescribed in the IR-SOD2004. The problem arising out of the curvature
needs to be dealt with independently insofar as the horizontal and
vertical gaps are concerned. However, with majority of stations being
with straight tracks, raising platform levels to the level 1200 mm
above ToR will ensure that in fully loaded condition, there will be no
level difference and in fully empty condition, commuters will have to
climb just 145 mm (< 6”). In fact for the new age coaches, platform
height at 1200 mm from ToR will more or less match the coach height.
Even the horizontal gap can be kept to mere 40 mm to account for
construction inaccuracies of Civil Works and coach manufacture.

The edge has variety of non-skid surface, even on the same platform.
Many of these become slippery with film of water, which abound during
monsoon. Considerable water spills on to this edge from the
decelerating or accelerating train during rain. This problem can be
tackled separately but prima facie it pertains to collecting and
disposing the rain water flowing into the rail coach roof gutter
without letting it fall on the platform. At some places, erroneously
slippery tiles have been placed such as at Mumbai Central suburban
section. These need to be replaced.



The reason for high level difference could be attributed to railways
following their “Schedule of Dimensions” which has been in use since
1913, updated periodically; platforms being constructed to designs
meant for non-suburban train coaches. These coaches are 3250 mm wide
(~3150 at floor level) while the suburban rail coaches are wide stock
of 3660 mm (~3560 at floor level) width on the same standard rail
coach chassis on broad gauge bogie. Horizontal gap for the
non-suburban trains come out to be as much as 95 mm. The first
footboard level generally matches the platform level. In suburban
train system, the concept of footboard does not exist; the floor of
the coach is the footboard.



Thus it can be seen that reducing the vertical gaps is possible; how
this can be done needs to be investigated, platform by platform. By
reducing this gap, the fatal accidents occurring by commuter falling
in the gap will have been addressed in addition to providing some
respite to all commuters, including to PwD insofar as boarding or
alighting is concerned. With the compartments for PwD relocated to
extremities, some methods can be evolved to enable even the wheelchair
bound person to board rail coaches and commute in the suburban rail
system. These methods adopted at the extremities then will not cause
disturbances to normal commuter movement.

Considering space constraints at certain stations, it may be
appropriate to provide elevators for PwD. Sometimes people with severe
ankle and knee problems find ramps unsuitable as also the staircases;
only elevators are suitable to them.


There are staircases and ramps which are very wide. Hand-railings need
to be provided at spacing between 2.5m to 4m so as to assist commuters
at large, but those carrying loads, plus those finding climbing
difficult without support.



While MUTP was planned to reduce the passenger density in the coach,
increase in rail commuters from about 60 lakh per day when MUTP was
planned to 75 lakh today has kept the load at status quo while
platforms, staircases and FOBs have become more crowded.

Therefore, to quickly evacuate commuters arriving at platforms
quickly, escalators need to be introduced. Lesser crowd on the
platform will also facilitate the PwD.

With application of mind and determination, facilities to PwD can be
provided that will ensure that they receive equal opportunity and full
participation. With these, there would also be greater safety and
convenience in travel for normal commuters as well.

There are other amenities that need to be looked at more expeditiously
simply because these can be implemented with least disturbance to
operations of Railway and commuters. These are providing toilets to
meet the requirements of PwD especially the wheel chair bound,
providing ticketing windows and also the vendor counters suitable to
PwD, the hand-railings of 40mm SS and not larger and its method of
fixing to the wall or column, providing central hand-railings on wide
staircases, ramps and FOBs and guiding tactile tiles all over the
station areas with proper layout. There should not be any change in
floor levels without clear indications such as at staircases or
hand-railings. Good architectural practices need to be followed at all
places that will not only cater to the needs of PwD but also for
normal commuters.



(Sudhir Badami is a civil engineer and transportation analyst. He is
on Government of Maharashtra’s Steering Committee on BRTS for Mumbai
and Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority’s Technical
Advisory Committee on BRTS for Mumbai. He is also member of Research &
MIS Committee of Unified Mumbai Metropolitan Transport Authority. He
was member of Bombay High Court appointed erstwhile Road Monitoring
Committee (2006-07). He is member of the Committee Constituted by the
Bombay High Court for making the Railways, especially the Suburban
Railways System Friendly towards Persons with Disability. While he has
been an active campaigner against noise for more than a decade, he is
a strong believer in functioning democracy. Mr Badami can be contacted
at [email protected]


Search for old postings at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

To unsubscribe send a message to
[email protected]
with the subject unsubscribe.

To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please 
visit the list home page at
http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in

Reply via email to