@Mohib, I am delighted to hear about your determination. I would be happy
to assist you whichever way I can.

@Raghvendra & @Srini.. this is a very serious matter  where 200 people VI
persons appointed as first and second divisonal assistance in various
departments are sittle idle without any alloted work. This is only going to
create a wrong impression in the state that disabled people are burden on
the government. The reality remains that the workplaces are not accessible
and barrier free to them and no reasonable accommodation or equalizing
environment is provided by the employer. How they can be expected to prove
their worth then? It is like asking a person to dig a deep pit without
giving him proper tools.

Recently, the office of CCPD and RCI had organised a consultative workshop
on a similar subject wherein suggestions have been drafted  for the DoPT to
plug the loopholes in the system so that employees with disabilties could
function optimally in the Union Govt. offices.

I think the contents of the draft memo should also be impressed upon for
acceptance by the respective states and if required should be taken up at
appropriate level.
regards



On 26 June 2013 01:31, Mohib Anwar Rafel <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Subhash sir, I appreciate the reservation policy of Delhi high
> court for providing reservation for VH candidates and carrying forward
> the posts since last two occasions. I am not sure, whether in upcoming
> recruitment the vacant seats will be carried forwarded or not? Because
> one petition was filed in Delhi high court regarding conversion of
> these vacancies into general seats since these are going unfilled each
> time.
> In spite of these reserve seats, so far  no VH could able to qualify.
> Subhash sir I am enough confident that i will be first VI judge in
> Delhi in next recruitment by Delhi high court.
>
> On 6/25/13, raghavendra <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Sir, his question is not about working as Judge. Recently Karnataka
> > Government has appointed around 200 visually impaired persons as first
> > and second divisional assistance in various departments. Maximum people
> > have been posted in district and Taluk courts. Still nobody has been
> > assigned with certain work. Here, almost all courts haven't modernized
> > with latest technologies like computers. On the other hand, departments
> > are not aware of giving particular work to the visually impaired
> > persons. That is why, he wanted to know about other states scenario.
> > Raghavendra
> >
>


> On 6/25/2013 5:43 PM, SC Vashishth wrote:
> >> Dear Srini,
> >  >
> >  > Delhi High Court was among the first few Courts to give reservations
> >  > to Blind/ Low Vision candidates in Judiciary after AICB took it up
> >  > with them long time back. However, I am sad to say that we do not
> >  > have a single Judge with blindness still!
> >  >
> >  > I am happy to learn that we have visually impaired judges in
> >  > Karnataka. I think, the posts on the following links might answer
> >  > some of your queries on the subject:
>
>
>
> http://www.changemakers.com/groups/how-can-blind-visually-impaired-person-work-judge
>
>
>
> http://subhashvashishth.blogspot.in/2009/11/step-further-to-ensure-that-blind.html
> regards Subhash
>

Warm regards,

Subhash Chandra Vashishth
Mobile: +91 (11) 9811125521
Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. Consider
environment!
Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of 
mobile phones / Tabs on:
http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in


Search for old postings at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

To unsubscribe send a message to
[email protected]
with the subject unsubscribe.

To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please 
visit the list home page at
http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in


Disclaimer:
1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the 
person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity;

2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent 
through this mailing list..

Reply via email to