-----Original message----- From: [email protected] Sent: 03/07/2013, 7:49 am To: Access india ; A k. Trasht; Advocate kishor m pal ; Akashvani ; Bakul chaturvedi ; C m hows ; C m sekretari ; Education ministar gujarat ; E t v gujarati ; Gavrang ; H.g dhoda ; Kartik sawhney ; Kiritbhai rathod ; Kirit vyas ; Kl school ; Labhubhai Tapubhai Sonani ; Mukeshbhai ; Nab ahmadavad ; Nitinbhai b bhavsar ; Parasbhai p n r ; Patrakar pareshbhai dave ; Pnr. Society ; PNR SOCIETY C.P ; PNR SOCIETY Mumbai ; Presh.Divya.bhaskar.baroda ; Presh.Gujrat.samachar baroda ; Primari education secretari of gujarat ; Rajesh mehta ; Rakhashia ; Ranchhod soni ; Shaktisinh goheel ; Shosial justis secretari gujarat office ; Shosial mineestar gujarat ; Sureshbhai trivedi ; Surykantbhai p n r ; T v 9 gujarati ; Yogeshbhai Akashvani Subject: FW: Vidyasahayak Case Details
-----Original message----- From: Bhushan Punani Sent: 02/07/2013, 5:50 pm To: Bhavesh Patel (NAB Vadodara); Hitesh Kanabar; Praful; Prakash Mankodi; Anantbhai Shah; Bhaskar Mehta; Chandrkant Solanki; Labhbhai Sonani; NAB Gujarat Braille Press; Yahya Sapatwala; J L Kaul; Praful Vyas Subject: Fw: Vidyasahayak Case Details Dear All, I am pleased to forward you the Judgment of High Court in the matter of Vidhya Sahayak. You will be very glad to know that due to hard work of all the blind persons who was selected as Vidhya Sahayak and were not appointed and due to cooperation of our Advocate, Mr. Kaushi Pujara, High Court delivered the most favourable Judgment. The summary of this landmark Judgment is given in Paragraph 16.1 of the Judgment which reads as follows "There is nothing on record to show that any action has been taken by the State Government to exempt appointment of Vidhya Sahayaks from the application of the provisions of Section 33 of the Act. Therefore, the decision of the respondents not to consider the Petitioner's for their appointment as Vidhya Sahayaks pursuant to the advertisement issued in the year 2010-11, as referred to hereinabove, is contrary to the provisions of Sections 32,33,34 &36 of the Act, 1995 and also unreasonable, arbitarary, discriminatory and violating of articles 14&16 of the Constitution of India". Just to inform all of you that Secretary, Department of Primary Education was ordered by the Court to remain present personally during the final hearing of the contempt application Now a good news, the Department of Primary Education has already issued letters to all the blind persons who had successfully comnpleted TAT exam. in respect of appointment of Vidhya Sahayak inviting them to remain present on 6th July for the finalization of their appointment. Saatyamev Jaye Best wishes, Bhushan Punani. ----- Original Message ----- From: "tarak luhar" <[email protected]> To: "Bhushan Punani" <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 3:45 PM Subject: Vidyasahayak Case Details > Respected Sir, > > Please find the attachment of Judgement of Vidyashayak Case. (Shri > K.B. Pujara Sir) > > Thanking You labhubhai sonani bhavnagar m. 9376688584 phone no 02782423917 > > Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ To unsubscribe send a message to [email protected] with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Disclaimer: 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent through this mailing list..
