The Economist always brings out the best from inside
http://www.economist.com/news/international/21582039-blind-people-defeat-lobbyists-tussle-about-copyright-between-lines
Print edition
Jul 20th, 2013
THE 198 books were piled on a table and wrapped in chains; only two
remained free. Blind people were helping the 600 negotiators at a
conference in the Moroccan city of Marrakesh visualise “book famine”.
The world’s 285m visually impaired people (40m of them blind), live
mostly in poor countries where books in friendly formats (Braille,
audio and large print) are scarce. A recent estimate is that Africa
has only 500 works for blind English-speakers.

The Marrakesh meeting was to finalise a copyright treaty, of which the
most important provision—according to Dan Pescod of Britain’s Royal
National Institute of Blind People—is to allow blind-friendly books to
be exported. Today’s copyright regime prohibits such cross-border
trade. A Braille book made in America, for example, cannot legally be
sold in Britain. Argentina has over 50,000 works available for
visually impaired readers, but they cannot be distributed in
neighbouring Uruguay, which has a paltry 4,000. Charities must
therefore acquire the rights and pay for another conversion (which can
cost more than $7,000). This takes time and wastes money.


In late 2012 the World Intellectual Property Organisation, a UN body,
suggested that the treaty could be signed the following June. But
copyright laws have powerful defenders who are suspicious of any
precedent that might dent their legal armour and business models. They
worry that negotiators might cite exemptions for the blind when they
hack away copyright laws to benefit other causes—looser drug patents,
for example. The treaty will also help charities sidestep copyright
laws in the 127 poor countries without legal provision for
blind-friendly formats.

The Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPO), a trade group,
warned the American negotiator, the US Patent Office, of the
“dangerous precedent” an agreement might set. Though the treaty hardly
affects Hollywood, it fears that unclear clauses could be abused, says
Chris Marcich of the Motion Picture Association of America. The MPAA
tried to remove the fair-use provision in the treaty, preferring other
existing rules which stipulate that “special cases” should not affect
“normal exploitation” of a work, or “unreasonably prejudice” the
owner’s interest. BusinessEurope, a lobby, wrote to the European
Commission to try to delay the signing. Hollywood also rustled up
support from foreign friends: Nollywood (Nigeria) and Bollywood
(India).

A round of negotiations in April brought “disaster”, says James Love,
head of Knowledge Ecology International, a Washington-based charity,
who helped draft the treaty. Although the talks had seemed almost
finished, discussions reopened on 88 clauses. After a week of haggling
in Morocco, careful wording ensured that the treaty was adopted on
June 27th, three days after the books in chains were piled outside the
venue. But for it to come into effect, 20 countries must pass it into
domestic law.


-- 
 Avinash Shahi
 Programme Executive at Score Foundation
 To know more,Why not visit our Website: http://www.eyeway.org/
 And M.Phil Research Scholar at Centre for The Study of Law and Governance JNU

Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of 
mobile phones / Tabs on:
http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in


Search for old postings at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

To unsubscribe send a message to
[email protected]
with the subject unsubscribe.

To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please 
visit the list home page at
http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in


Disclaimer:
1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the 
person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity;

2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent 
through this mailing list..

Reply via email to