http://www.indianexpress.com/news/insensitive-by-design/1155943/0
block quote
Civic infrastructure in major Indian cities still fails to provide for
the needs of people with disabilities.
Every year, the monsoon brings with it an outpouring of angst against
the poor state of our civic infrastructure. This is completely
justified. But spare a thought for a category of people for whom
accessing infrastructure is a daily struggle, no matter what the
season. According to the WHO and World Bank report on disability,
2011, approximately 15 per cent of the world's population lives with a
disability. Applying that statistic to India, there must be about 186
million people with disabilities in the country. Neither public
infrastructure, nor awareness, nor the sensitivity of government
personnel, are in any way commensurate with this number. Recent
reports of the humiliating and insensitive treatment of an amputee by
CISF personnel at the Mumbai airport only confirm this.

Despite a major overhaul of Delhi's infrastructure for the
Commonwealth games in 2010, accessing pedestrian facilities —
something that most people take for granted — is still a nightmare for
disabled persons. For the most part, footpaths themselves are
non-existent. Where they do exist, access onto and along them is still
a major concern due to issues as innocuous as uneven or steep kerb
ramps, poor paving and myriad obstructions. Often, they are too high
to be accessed because they have no kerb ramps at all. At other times,
access to them is blocked by bollards intended to prevent vehicular
traffic from getting onto them. While motor cycles and scooters still
find a way onto footpaths, people using wheelchairs or crutches find
it difficult to bypass these obstructions.

During the recent "refurbishment" and beautification of footpaths in
some localities of Delhi, tactile tiles — intended to assist
pedestrians who are visually impaired — were incorporated into
pavement designs. But they have mostly been used for decorative
purposes. Many a contractor and engineer thought the bright yellow of
these tiles was intended to visually jazz up pavements. It is a
travesty that these guides, provided to orient and navigate a blind
pedestrian, often lead head-on into trees, poles, manholes etc.

Road crossings are not designed to be inclusive either. Frequently,
they do not have median refuge areas that mobility-aid users can
access, because they are built at a considerable height. There are no
audio signals at pedestrian crossings that could alert a visually
impaired person as to when it is safe to cross a road. Access features
like ramps or lifts in subways and foot overbridges are often missing.
Did anyone imagine that there could be so many variables to come to
grips with before one could cross a road?

To the Delhi administration's credit, we now have low-floor buses with
access ramps and space for wheelchair users. Bus shelters have also
been made accessible through tactile pavers, ramps and handrails.
However, buses do not have precision-docking systems and mostly do not
stop at the actual stop. Passengers have to get onto the road in order
to board buses. This negates the utility of the low-floor buses and
ramps.

The solutions to these problems are not rocket science. The Indian
Roads Congress has published codes and guidelines, as has the Delhi
Development Authority through its Unified Traffic and Transportation
Infrastructure (Planning and Engineering) Centre (UTTIPEC). The
UTTIPEC Street Design Guidelines are applicable to Delhi/NCR. It
mandates that all road owning and civic agencies comply with street
designs standards to make mobility safe, dignified and comfortable for
all pedestrians and public transport users. The implementation of
these access requirements is imperative to further the goal of
"universal accessibility", to create seamless travel chains from
origin to destination. Lack of access at any point breaks the chain,
and negates the benefits of infrastructure that is accessible.

The lack of enforcement and punitive action for noncompliance is the
problem. There is nothing to compel government bodies to implement
these measures. The only way to change this scenario is for each state
to incorporate such guidelines into their road/ streetscape standards,
by law, and approval/ tender processes. A few have done so, but most
have not. Without these changes, citizens of this country living with
disabilities will continue to be short-changed by a government that is
failing to discharge its obligations to them.

The Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995 and the UN Convention on the
Rights of Persons With Disabilities, which India has signed and
ratified in 2007, stresses the importance for "persons with
disabilities to have access, on an equal basis with others". There are
moral, legal and commercial benefits to providing universally
accessible street infrastructure. It is time that we demanded quality
and safe pedestrian infrastructure. Our Constitution guarantees us
freedom of movement throughout the territory of India. It is time to
fully claim this right.


The writer, an assisted wheelchair user, is an access consultant with
the Union government and heads Samarthyam, National Centre for
Accessible Environments
block quote end

-- 
Avinash Shahi
M.Phil Research Scholar
Centre for The Study of Law and Governance
Jawaharlal Nehru University
New Delhi India

Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of 
mobile phones / Tabs on:
http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in


Search for old postings at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

To unsubscribe send a message to
[email protected]
with the subject unsubscribe.

To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please 
visit the list home page at
http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in


Disclaimer:
1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the 
person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity;

2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent 
through this mailing list..

Reply via email to