In continuation with my earlier mail on NAPSIPAG’s Tenth International
Conference, I’m pasting here the concept note.

Call for papers for the NAPSIPAG’s Tenth International Conference
hosted by the Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi
7th to 9th December 2013
on
“Locked in Growth Patterns: Rethinking land, water and disasters for
the post-2015 Development
Agenda”
Concept note:
Disasters have a definite connection to developmental planning over
land which includes forests,
mountains, river catchments and coastal zones. Disaster mitigation and
prevention ‘at-source’ strategies
begins with land management. The world is rapidly moving into a
direction of development in which
sustainable resources of land and water are being traded for cash,
creating disparities, degradation and
disintegration of human prosperity. Unsustainable development beyond
the carrying capacity of land and
water triggers disasters which have a long term effect on development
and the processes of income
generation. As nature strikes back, human beings have no-one else but
themselves to blame.
The present conference cum workshop would look into land governance
and management in a manner
that the long term sustainability of natural resources, developmental
gains and human well being does not
get lost in disasters, and when disasters strike then there is a
definite plan of action to mitigate and
minimize the losses in terms of life and property. This would look
into the role of governance in
preventing disasters and also providing human security to reduce the
risk of death and destruction. Ban
Ki-moon, Secretary General of the United Nations passionately
remarked, “What we do not realize is that
disasters can have long-term impacts that impede development. We must
look at challenges posed by
disasters through a development lens as we accelerate efforts to
achieve the Millennium Development
Goals and discuss post-2015 priorities.”
The core concerns of this conference/workshop are;
list of 6 items
• Land management and infrastructural development has a direct
relationship to most environmental disasters.
• Sustainable human development is threatened due to increasing
frequency of environmental disasters.
• Knowledge based land and water management and planning can reduce
many disasters at their sources.
• Governance should embody a knowledge based long term agenda for land
development in every country.
• The focus of governance in any country should be knowledge
generation, skill development and participatory management of land and
local resources.
• Land acquisition for any mega project should calculate costs in
terms of resources which are geo-physical such as water table,
topography, underground
aquifers,indigenous wisdom, ecosystem damages, displacement, loss of
livelihood, rehabilitation cost, genetic losses of flora and fauna
list end
list of 3 items
and ethics of the nature of development. Compensation packages should
include concerns which come as knowledge about land sharpens and
deepens.
• Judiciary can contribute to better land management by entertaining
not just geo-physical evidences but also communitarian, symbolic and
emotive evidences
which lie behind human adaptability and emotional strength as a
citizen of a country.
• Communities need training in disaster mitigation and prevention as
much as in being important stakeholders in appropriate land
management.
list end
Increasing vulnerability of the Asia Pacific region: The Asia Pacific
region is becoming increasingly
vulnerable to a rising ferocity and frequency of disasters of many
types, including floods, cyclones, storm
surges, earthquakes,drought, hurricanes and tsunamis. Despite the
warnings coming through the studies
related to climate change impacts, the management of land has remained
unaffected by the demands of
carrying capacity, inter and intra-generational equity and justice
concerns. During the past decade, on
average, more than 200 million people were affected and more than
70,000 people were killed by natural
disasters annually. With unsustainable changes being made in patterns
of land use, catchment and coastal
zones, increasing density of population and concrete structures
occupying high-risk areas over mountains,
migration patterns, consumer culture even in wilderness virgin
ecosystem zones , the impact of disasters
has increased manifold. The Statistical Yearbook for Asia and the
Pacific 2011, EM-DAT: Emergency
Events Database and UN Ecosystem Assessment Reports highlight the
impending dangers embedded in
the growth journey of today. Its high time that decision makers
sincerely revisit the developmental agenda
which has brought growth and prosperity at the cost of human security
and sustainable development.
Development over land affects water table as it affects the flow of
river water, its natural direction and
catchments economics. This in turn disturbs the internal balance of
rocks, triggering earthquakes,floods
and tsunamis. The world has been caught unawares with the magnitude of
devastation that followed the
Indian Ocean Tsunami in 2004.The cause was the earthquake at the
bottom of the Indian Ocean when the
Indian Plate and the Burma Plate collided to trigger a series of
devastating tsunamis along the coasts of
Indonesia (with Sumatra as its epicenter), Sri Lanka, India and
Thailand. It was one of the deadliest
natural disasters ever recorded in environmental history of this world
killing 230,000 people in more than
fourteen countries and inundating coastal communities with more than
30 meters high waves. The region
was yet to recover from this spectre of death , destruction and decay
when a series of disasters struck the
region one after the other with earthquakes in Pakistan (2005), Java
(2006), Sichuan in China (2008) and
deadly tropical cyclones and floods in Australia(Yasi 2011,
2006),Sichuan(2006), Pakistan (2010). The
world clock of development came to a halt when in 2011 the Pacific
Coast of Tohoku in Japan was struck
by an undersea megathrust earthquake triggering powerful tsunamis
travelling upto many kilometers and
shifting the Earth on its axis by estimates of between 10 cms (4”) and
25cms(10”).It was not just loss of
human lives but also a complete collapse of growth, development, power
stations, roads, buildings,
railways and drinking water. The worst which followed was the nuclear
accident in Daiichi and Daini
nuclear power plants which were the symbols of economic power and
prosperity. To normalize whatever
could be possible the total bank led recovery cost was USD 183 billion
by the Bank of japan and USD
235 billion from the World Bank. This was over and above the insured
losses at USD 14.5 to USD 34.6
billion.However, disasters still did not stop as cloudburst in the
upper regions of Himalayas of
Uttarakhand in India washed away thousands of clueless pilgrims,
visitors and villages downstream the
river Ganges in June 2013 this year.
Post-disaster reconstruction and rehabilitation led governance
strategies:The rehabilitation is a
challenge for even the best of governance systems.The process of
reconstruction, uniting lost and
disrupted people and families, building homes and restoring
administration and citizens services is
obstructed ,diverted and delayed due to the spread of diseases,
epidemics such as SARS,H1N1
Influenza(Swine Flu), Malaria, Ebola heaorrhagic fever and XDR TB
which continue to make life equally
vulnerable even after the disasters.Countries have applied various
models of reconstruction and
rehabilitation on short term basis but a sustainable strategy has to
move alongside and beyond the Hyogo
Framework for Action (HFA) and serve as the coordinating mechanism for
mainstreaming disaster risk
reduction into development policies, planning and programmes. As
UNISDR suggests, “ A single
'blueprint' approach for National Platforms is neither possible nor
desirable since disaster risk reduction is
a country-specific long-term process”. General principles on how to
form, run and sustain National
Platforms are outlined in the UNISDR document Guidelines for National
Platforms for Disaster Risk
Reduction, but National Platforms essentially decide on how to
organize and run themselves according to
local needs.Thus disaster risk reduction strategies are community ,
region and country specific requiring a
highly decentralized approach. Success would demand community
empowerment, information systems
and a participatory team oriented administration. Weber’s model of
pyramidical,hierarchies bordered by
departmental regulations may have to change to an administrative
system which is open and constantly
resonating to the ecosystem signals and community preparedness.
Disaster Control administrators have a
24/7 and 365 days of work and their efficiency depends upon their
ability to manage and adapt to this
demand.
Mitigating impact of disasters through preparedness: The Prime
Minister Shinzo Abe of Japan
warned that climate change is only going to make it worse, country
governance and institutions be
strengthened to encounter this increasing risk to communities,
economic growth and the process of
development. As disasters do not respect boundaries or distinguish
between incomes of growth thus
common platforms of partnerships are indispensable. However,
statistics from the Asia Pacific suggests
that the impact of disasters is much less in high-income countries due
to their better preparedness in
technology for early warning systems, administrative training and
institutional functioning.In Asia-Pacific
high income countries, about 1 person in every 1,000 people was
affected by disasters and 1 in 1 million
died during the 10 years from 2001 to 2010; in low-income countries
nearly 30 in 1,000 people were
affected and 52 in 1 million people killed. More people in the
lower-middle income group were affected
than people in the low-income countries, although the mortality ratio
in the lower-middle group was
lower.
Interrogating legal frameworks for ‘land and Ecosystem Conservation’
in Disaster Risk Reduction
Strategies:
Logically, healthy ecosystems help protect people from disasters which
suggests that development should
be habitat specific which grows in relationship to its ecosystem.
Mountains cannot have high rise
buildings or urbanization as it is in the plains. They cannot sustain
their ecology in the midst of too much
concrete, deforestation, blocked river beds or chocked streams to give
space to increasing density of
population and tourist settlers. Similarly embankments on rivers,
coastal zone refineries of mining and oil,
unplanned infrastructural growth and destruction of ecological and
wilderness areas, pristine forest zones,
effluent discharge over coral and mangroves regions sustaining fishing
industry is a policy which invites
disasters. A study of comparative law across countries in the Asia
Pacific suggests that much less has
come out of these conservation frameworks of environmental ministries
and agencies towards increasing
resilience levels and sustaining developmental gains.
The Priority 4 of the Hyogo Framework for Action (HFA), the first
international plan to substantially
reduce disaster losses by 2015, suggests “Sustainable ecosystems and
environmental management” to
“reduce the underlying risk factors”. This is the priority where least
progress has been made so far,
according to the HFA’s mid-term review. Despite its direct impact on
each of the HFA’s priority areas,
ecosystems are also not officially recognised as a crosscutting issue.
Besides the governments, even
universities are hesitant to adopt them for fear of displacing vested
interests in the teaching of politics and
economics of cash to ecological economics frameworks.
Professor Nick Brown of Oxford University’s Department of Plant
Sciences highlights that there are not
enough studies in establishing links between ecosystems, resilience
and DRR due to the diversity of
ecosystems, geophysical conditions and hazards. Politics of each
country looks for short term gains and
are so locked up in current growth patterns that ecosystem based DRR
approaches which have a long
gestation period is generally ignored. Similarly, Professor Wadid
Erian, a lead author for the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), that “the most
effective adaptation and disaster risk
reduction programmes are those that offer development benefits in the
short term and reduce
vulnerability in the long term”.
In conclusion, the challenge for public administration in each country
is to pause and look backwards
and redesign the philosophy and strategies of development over land
and other resources which hold life
together when disasters strike.
A: Papers are invited on the following themes:
list of 9 items
1. Evidence based studies on the relationship of land management and disasters.
2. Policies and innovations in the management of land, rivers and
coastal zones.
3. Critical analysis of ‘Country specific strategies’ in land
management, disaster risk reduction and in building community
resilience.
4. Administrative preparedness and political response to disasters.
5. Best Practices in land management, rehabilitation and
reconstruction especially in a comparative framework.
6. Adopting technology support in disaster risk reduction and
providing human security.
7. Role of Environment Impact Analysis before land acquisition for a
mega project
8. Models of ‘Ecosystem regeneration’ and strengthening community resilience.
9. Role of laws and judicial responses in conservation, rehabilitation
and regeneration of vulnerability areas or high risk zones.
list end
B: Last date for receiving abstracts: 1st September 2013
list of 4 items
• Abstract should be around 500-600 words, explaining in crisp notes
the following sections:
a) The central theme of the paper in 50-80 words
b) Hypothesis in 50 words.
c) Research questions not more than two which would be studied in the paper.
list end
list of 2 items
d) A brief baseline of literature(books, reports, narratives and
government experience) on which your paper would be based upon in 150
-200 words.
e) Methodology and theoretical foundations in 150 words
list end
C: Authors of selected abstracts would be informed by the 15th
September 2013 to write a paper with suggested revisions if any.
D: Last date for receiving papers: 1st November 2013 @ email:
[email protected]
Country Coordinator: Dr. Sylvia Yambem
Conference Coordinator: Ajay Arora and Ms. Manika Kamthan
Secretariat Research Group: Dr. Suman Sharma, Prof. Mondira Dutta,
Prof. Sachidanand Sinha, Prof.
Shashi Prabha Kumar, Prof. Vaishna Narang, Prof. B.N.Chattoraj(NICFS),
Dr. Girish Kumar (IIPA), Dr.
Milap Punia, Mr. Chetan Sharma(Datamation Foundation),Dr. Rajkumar
Prasad(Commonwealth e-
Governance) and Dr. Manveen Kaur (HIPA).
Student Research Group: Binod, Adnan, Nishu




-- 
Ajay Arora
PHD Research Scholar
centre for the study of law and governance
JNU, new delhi India
Mail to:
[email protected]
skype ID:
speakajay

Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of 
mobile phones / Tabs on:
http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in


Search for old postings at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

To unsubscribe send a message to
[email protected]
with the subject unsubscribe.

To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please 
visit the list home page at
http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in


Disclaimer:
1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the 
person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity;

2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent 
through this mailing list..

Reply via email to