*Copy of Letter Addressed to the Delhi Chief Minister*

*Rape of a Disabled Girl*

* *

* *

August 22, 2013

* *

*Smt. Sheila Dikshit *

*Chief Minister*

*Government of Delhi*





*Dear Dikshitji*,





It is with great pain and anguish that we are writing this letter to you.
It concerns the rape of an eleven year old girl with developmental
disabilities, a resident of Samta Vihar, Mukundpur of Jahangirpuri, North
Delhi, on August 14, 2013.



After we learnt of the incident from some newspapers of August 15, one of
which had the headline -- *“**Hearing-impaired girl raped; neighbour
arrested”* -- a team of activists visited the Bhalswa Dairy Police station
as also the family of the victim on August 17.



Though the concerned Investigating Officer tried to the best of her
knowledge to use specific provisions of the Criminal Law Amendment Act 2013
as also the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act 2012, the
process to get justice for victim, we apprehend, may be hampered. The lady
officer did bring in a “sign language expert” to try and communicate with
the girl.



There is a very common misconception that a person who cannot speak is also
deaf.  What we learnt after talking to the victim’s parents was that though
the girl cannot speak due to some neurological disorder, she was not deaf
and has no knowledge of sign language either. So the exercise of bringing
in a sign language interpreter to assist was futile. A special educator
could have helped.



We also understand that the statement of the victim was not recorded at her
residence but at the Police Station, which militates against the CLAA 2013
which clearly specifies that statements of disabled victims should be
recorded by the “police officer, at the residence of the person seeking to
report such offence or at a convenient place of such person’s choice, in
the presence of an interpreter or a special educator, as the case may be”.
Also that “the recording of such information shall be videographed; and * *the
police officer shall get the statement of the person recorded by a Judicial
Magistrate under clause *(0) *of sub-section *(SA) *of section 164 as soon
as possible”.  The intent here is not to find fault with the I/O but point
out the general lack of awareness among the police force about these new
provisions in their entirety.



The neighbourhood school which the girl attends along with her sister is
not equipped to teach such children. We were told by the parents that there
is no special educator in the school, which is mandatory under the *Sarva
Shiksha Abhiyan*. Consequently, this young girl is being deprived of
education in her formative years. According to her parents, she is learning
“nothing” at school.



We were also informed by her parents that she is being treated for epilepsy
at the Indian Institute of Human Behaviour and Allied Sciences. However,
despite having disabilities which are obvious, doctors at the IHBAS
discouraged the parents from procuring a disability certificate saying that
she is “under treatment”.



While treatment for epilepsy is essential, it should in no way be an alibi
for denying a disability certificate. This is inexcusable from an institute
which has the Minister for Health, Government of Delhi as its President and
Chief Secretary, Government of Delhi as the Chairman of the Executive
Council.



You will appreciate that coming from a family that resides in an area where
slum dwellers have been rehabilitated, deprival of rights like proper
education or even a disability certificate will come in the way of the
victim seeking and getting justice.



In the light of the above, we put forward the following for your
consideration:



1.    A proper and thorough investigation has to be conducted in the case
so that the accused does not get away with the “benefit of doubt” in the
court.

2.    Initiate measures to ensure that victim girl gets proper education.

3.    Ensure that her disability certificate is issued immediately.

4.    Adequate compensation should be provided.

5.    Specific issues concerning girls and women with disabilities as also
of the new provisions in the law should be included in the sensitization
programmes of the police force.



The team that visited the police station and the family comprised of
Muralidharan from the National Platform for the Rights of the Disabled,
Shampa Sengupta from the Sruti Disabilty Rights Centre and Pradeep Raj and
Sonu Bhola from the Association for Disabled People.



We hope you will initiate immediate action on the above, as also take any
additional measures that you may deem necessary.





With regards,











Yours sincerely









*(Muralidharan)*

*Assistant Convener*

*9868768543*
Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of 
mobile phones / Tabs on:
http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in


Search for old postings at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

To unsubscribe send a message to
[email protected]
with the subject unsubscribe.

To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please 
visit the list home page at
http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in


Disclaimer:
1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the 
person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity;

2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent 
through this mailing list..

Reply via email to