While I don't disagree with anything stated here, it must be said that all
disabilities bring their own set of problems with them. Why a disability, it
could even be a long-term illness or a condition. Life is full of such
adjustments, after all.      
Perhaps there is some wisdom in certain disabled persons preferring
spouses/partners with the same disability. 

Geetha
-----Original Message-----
From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf
Of avinash shahi
Sent: 25 October 2013 12:19
To: jnuvision
Cc: accessindia
Subject: [AI] Essay: On His Blindness by Lauren Bishop-Weidner

Doth God exact day-labour, light denied.
 (John Milton, 1608-1674)
 Everyone recognized Dr. Nelson.  A political science professor at Southern
Illinois University, the man was a campus fixture, kind and gentlemanly,
impeccably dressed.  We marveled at the dignity and ease with which he and
his guide dog navigated the hilly, wooded campus.
He was exotic, intriguing, Other.  He was conspicuous.
This was in the late 1970s.  Fast-forward to Dr. Nelson’s Ball State
counterpart, Dr. Tom Weidner.  When we married at the ripe old age of 21, we
both knew he had a slowly progressive eye disease, but the potential that he
could become blind, the ramifications of living day-to-day with a
disability, these were merely Star Trek holograms, no more real than old age
or parenthood.  By 1993, Tom was a full professor and well-established
scholar, father of three lively children.  And he was blind—I found myself
married to the man everyone recognized, the guy with the dog.  I took refuge
in memories of Dr.
Nelson’s classy attitude and demeanor.  I wrote him a letter, and he
responded with a stark honesty that gives me pause still:  “Blindness is a
grievous disability.”
Wait a minute!  Excuse me, sir, but that’s the wrong answer.  I want to hear
how utterly normal and ordinary you are, how your life is just like everyone
else’s, how the dog gets you everywhere you want to go.
I want you to make me feel better, gild the disability, paste on a smiley
face.
Grievous?  As in loss?  The relentless pain of the not-there?  Well, yes.
Blindness is relentless.  Beth Finke, a Chicago-based commentator for
National Public Radio, states, “People think… that everything’s okay now,
that I’ve ‘overcome’ my blindness.  But it’s just not true.  The only people
who conquer disabilities are those who are cured.  The rest of us…live with
our disabilities, not despite them.”
It sounds so deceptively simple, so positive, so politically correct:
“living with disabilities.”  To quote Finke again, “On good days, I think of
this as a blessing:  Not everyone gets a chance to live life from such
completely different perspectives.  On bad days, I grieve.”[1] That word
again, with its connotations of burden and heaviness and pain.  Despite the
magic of computers and other adaptive technologies; despite polite,
dependable guide dogs; despite the rebellious, resilient human spirit;
despite intellectual or marital status; despite elaborate coping mechanisms
and soul-deep joie de vivre, people’s lives are diminished by blindness.
I’m not saying that blind people don’t lead full, productive, joyful lives.
Of course they do—Beth Finke, for example, or Tom Weidner.
Homer, John Milton, Ray Charles.  What I am saying is that we tend to gloss
over, ignore, paint in pretty colors the difficulties that just plain do
attend blindness.
Let’s watch a bit, make like voyeurs into my husband’s world, a world
navigated by fingers and ears, faith and grit.
He sets the alarm by listening, one number at a time; then checks to be sure
he has the correct time—a.m. or p.m.?  Alarm, CD, or radio?
Did he get the alarm button or did he accidentally hit the time?  He checks
all of the above, patiently listening to the clock:  “Hour setting, 5, 6:00.
It’s 6:00 a.m.  Minute setting, 0, minute 5, minute 10, minute 15, alarm
off, it’s 6:15 a.m.  Alarm on, it’s 6:15 a.m.”
Morning; he shuts off the alarm and moves toward the bathroom, but dammit,
the kids left a Lego block on the floor—ouch!  Flinching at the pain in the
arch of his foot, he bangs his nose on the bathroom door.  And he hasn’t
even peed yet.  True, anyone can fall prey to renegade Legos and diabolical
doors, but for the blind, these petty frustrations become routine.
Continuing through the rest of his morning ablutions:  take a shower (what’s
the difference between liquid soap and shampoo, between shampoo and
conditioner, between shaving cream and hair mousse?); get dressed (pants to
the left of the tie hanger, tie hung around shirt, shirt hung next to pants,
all carefully pre-arranged); have some coffee (pour to finger, burn finger,
rinse finger); eat breakfast (instant oatmeal again, it has more flavor than
dry toast and is easier than trying to land the butter in the right place).
Oh, and the dog requires morning ablutions as well, because he, too, must be
socially acceptable.
Before our Peeping Tom day ends, countless other obstacles will bedevil
him—a laundry basket trips him up as he gets the dog’s dishes; the dog has
diarrhea; the secretary is sick; the meeting has been moved to a cramped
room across campus, in an unfamiliar building; construction blocks the dog’s
usual grassy area for doing business.
Professional travel gets a bit tricky.  Relying on airport employees, pluck,
and helpful strangers, Tom gets to the hotel, engaging a bellhop to carry
his suitcase—with one hand working a dog, he needs a free hand for things
like doors and elevator buttons.  The suitcase is meticulously packed so
that he doesn’t wear the black shirt with the navy blazer, or the brown
jacket with the gray suit pants.  “Find the counter,” he tells the dog.
Alas, the dog goes to the wrong counter, so someone leads the duo to the
registration desk.  “Follow!” is the dog’s command, this time a bit curt.
Tom produces his hotel confirmation, credit card, etc.  He then asks for a
couple of pieces of Scotch tape, and requests help finding a grassy spot for
the dog’s relief area.  Tape?  Grass?  The tape goes on the cardkey for the
door, so that he can feel which way to insert the card; another piece goes
on the door itself, so that he can be sure he’s trying to open the right
door.  And then there’s the grass, always an adventure.  In San Francisco,
the nearest grass was six blocks from the conference hotel.  In Anaheim,
there was a four-foot square gravel area near a utility hook-up.  In St.
Louis, we found a tree in a pot—the dog jumped into the pot(ty?) and could
just exactly squat, hitting the mulch most of the time.
Over the years, Tom has developed a philosophical sense of humor, necessary
to maintain sanity and smooth his bumpy path through life.
He quips one-liners to the travel professionals whose job it is to ensure
that he finds the restroom (or the grassy area), gets on the right airplane,
figures out the various routes to and from meeting rooms.  He jokes easily
and frequently with students, colleagues, and assorted strangers, helping
those around him to be more comfortable with his blindness.  The guide
dog—intelligent, dignified, clean, alert—the dog helps bridge the awkward
spaces, too.  The two of them, dog and man, smile bravely and believably, if
sometimes through gritted teeth.  Yet there remains a subterranean
frustration, helplessness, even humiliation, in needing assistance for
everyday activities, activities most of us take for granted.
Okay, here is where I should shift gears and take you to the positive side
of blindness, share some of those funny one-liners and stories that act as
social lubricant, humor being the best defense against the inevitable
awkward moments.  Humor does ease the pain, both physical and psychological.
In mid-flight a passenger once blurted out, “Hey!  There’s a dog here!”  Tom
ignored him the first time but when he persisted, Tom turned to him and
asked, “What are you talking about?” then leaned over, felt around for his
guide dog, a rather obvious black Lab whose haunches were crammed
uncomfortably under the seat, forcing Tom to straddle the dog, and
exclaimed, “Hey!  There IS a dog on this plane!”
 The silliness lightened the awkwardness for everyone.
Clownish, yes, but these moments free people to acknowledge the elephant in
the room (or the dog gas in the air).  Recently I watched Tom walk into a
pillar in a restaurant and ask it where the men’s room was; then recognizing
his error, he patted it kindly, thanked it for its time, and moved on as
though talking to pillars was a part of his everyday business.
Tom is creative in softening the awkwardness through humor and quirkiness.
He and a friend made light of the unavoidable grand entrance to a concert
(B.B. King) by walking in together, each with a hand on the harness,
“sharing” the guide dog.  At a recent professional conference, where Tom
presented research findings to a group of about 500 colleagues, he planted
several slides in his
PowerPoint:  “Don’t laugh, you’ll only encourage him!”  “Sshhh!  If you file
out quietly, he’ll never know.”
The guide dogs, too, ease the way, often with a touch of sass.  Guide dogs
are the crème de la crème of the canine world, the Rhodes Scholars, the Ivy
League gang.  Like smart people, smart dogs tend to have strong and
idiosyncratic personalities.  Guide dogs lead sheltered lives, trained to
value the human voice over their own instincts.  They don’t get to bury
bones or jump in the cow pond or chase rabbits or sniff and lick themselves.
The first time we took Tom’s dog swimming in Texas’ pristine Guadalupe
River, he cowered at the shore.  Finally, obedience won over fear, and he
timidly joined us in the water, paddling immediately to my sister and
jumping in her arms—80 lbs. of frightened Labrador retriever.  Like Tom, the
dogs are resourceful.
Another dog did love the water and loved to play fetch.  This one
accompanied Tom and a friend on a canoe trip, where, on a break, the dog
brought a large, smooth rock weighing about 10 lbs. and dropped the boulder
at Tom’s feet:  “Come on Dad, let’s play!”  Luckily, the rock didn’t break
any bones. Asked to find the counter at a Subway once, Tom’s dog promptly
stood on his hind legs and placed his front paws on the counter, ready to
order.
In some ways, I suppose I could argue that Tom’s blindness actually enlarges
our world, perhaps softens it a bit.  That “perspective”
Finke mentions.  We will always have a calm, even-tempered, obedient,
beautiful dog, without the hassle of soiled carpets or chewed shoes.
Tom is never hampered by a person’s appearance; his impressions are
refreshingly free of the prejudices that spring from physical attractiveness
or political correctness.  In Tom’s mind’s eye, I am eternally in my early
30s, when his vision took its final downturn.  I may go gray, sag and droop
where I once perked and poofed, but the effects of age are primarily visual.
There is some small comfort there, in our youth-obsessed, image-saturated
culture.
And yet, I’m not willing to add the “but” clause:  “Blindness is a grievous
disability, but…”  Blindness permeates everything, for the blind person and
for all who love and live with him.
Consider for a minute how it feels, at 13, to have to make a joke when your
dad sits in the wrong chair at the assembly, or fumbles finding the right
one.  You can’t be mortified—he’s your dad, after all, a responsible, decent
parental unit, someone you actually respect, though you’d never let on in
public.  What if it was your Lego block he hurt his foot on, after the
tantrum you threw last night when he accidentally crashed into your
carefully crafted masterpiece, sending its components flying?  Your doll
with a broken arm—you left her in the floor where you had been playing, and
Daddy stepped on her.  Your racetrack, bent beyond use by an errant
Daddy-foot.  Your milkshake on the counter where you left it for a minute to
go to the bathroom, now spilled on the floor, for you to clean up.  Consider
the Grand Entrance this family makes, always—at church, the ballgame, dance
recital, gymnastics meet, concert.  Oh, you get used to it, shrugging off
and pushing down any stubborn feelings of embarrassment.  You put your stuff
out of his way—one smashed iPod and you learn your lesson.
You adapt.  But it is a conscious effort, and it is relentless.
For me, living with blindness means protecting Tom, protecting the kids,
protecting us all, from the inevitable fall-out of blindness.
Buffering it, like I’m the first line of defense.   Whether or not
that is actually true, it feels that way.  I constantly check for obstacles,
pick up almost obsessively, move the Lego contraption to the corner and hope
he doesn’t go there, get the UPS package off the porch before he trips on
it, put away the laundry baskets, verbalize
everything:  “Dishwasher is open.” “There’s a basket by the basement
door.” “The cat is right by the door; don’t let him out.”   I kill the
spiders, answer the late-night doorbell, clean up the spilled wine or coffee
or milkshake.  Not because Tom can’t, but because all of our lives are
easier with fewer “blindisms.”
Like the guide dog, I am ever-alert, ever-vigilant, checking fore and aft
for booby traps.  Unlike the dog, though, I’d really like to engage in
meaningful conversation as we walk; rest while my partner drives; do the
“lady” thing while my man forges the way, opens the doors, protects me from
the elements.
Anger and frustration are frequent houseguests.  Children leave toys in the
floor; dogs and cats (and children) get underfoot; door angles shift from
when you came through a little while ago.  Stuff happens, and tension
builds.
It makes for a skewed domestic life.  Everything on his to-do list requires
maneuvering around the blindness.  Making coffee by feel, adding cream and
sugar by faith.  Wiping off counters gingerly, hoping to avoid knocking over
the crystal wine glass.  Loading the dishwasher or clothes washer, one hand
feeling for blank spots.  Eventually, the law of probability kicks in.  The
glass breaks, the wine stains, the coffee spills (and burns), the overdyed
blue jeans get washed with the white camisole.  The ramifications are
far-ranging, encompassing gender expectations, finances, career choices,
family planning, leisure activities—everything.
            Season by season, inch by inch, Tom’s vision loss has forced us
to change our lives, in increments.  With young children and their needs and
activities, many of which involve transportation and volunteer work, it
seemed logical that I stay home full-time.
Eventually, it became clear that we couldn’t manage the modern two-career
family—transportation and errands and appointments simply claimed too much
time.  I took a position as a part-time university instructor, a job I love,
a job that is perfect for our family, a job I might very well have chosen.
Only I didn’t get to.  And that makes a difference.
Our recreational activities are completely different now.  One too many
singed eyebrows, and Tom had to concede that charcoal grilling was no longer
safe; a headlong fall into a construction ditch convinced him that it was
time to give up another cherished activity, running alone; bare feet gave
way to flip flops, which gave way to sandals, which gave way to shoes.
Playing catch with the kids, watching movies and television, riding
horses—once hobbies we all enjoyed, now casualties of blindness.
Or vacations—Tom’s blindness relentlessly requires accommodation.
“Are we there yet?” loses much of its punch.  When we finally arrive at our
vacation destination, we don’t get to drop everything and go play.  We have
to stow our stuff carefully, along the perimeters; figure out designated
spots for toiletries; show Tom the layout of the rooms, where the dog can
relieve himself, where the snacks are, how to get to the beach or pool or
exercise room or whatever.  We have fun, eventually.  After we accommodate
blindness.
Sightseeing takes on a whole new meaning.  Most sights are exactly that.
Everything is unfamiliar, therefore requiring careful, detailed explanation.
Outdoor adventures take on near-demented dimensions, and we have had some
terrifying experiences—a memorable trek along a “moderate” piece of the
Appalachian Trail, with sheer bluffs on either side of an 18-inch path; a
whitewater run where nothing more than quick reflexes and sheer physical
strength kept Tom in the raft as it careened down the Nollichucky River.
Now we hire our own guide for hiking and other potentially life-threatening
pursuits, an expensive addition that eliminates independent exploring.  But
even in the best case scenario, where the guide finds wonderful places that
incorporate other senses—still, Tom can’t fully share the breathtaking view,
the awesome power of the waterfall or rapids, the sun as it gracefully melts
into the ocean.
Vacations are anything but relaxing.
Socially, too, blindness is always a force to be reckoned with, a constant
companion demanding energy and attention.  Requiring accommodation.  We—his
friends, family, whoever he’s with—open the doors, point out his chair, show
him where the restroom is, read the beer or wine list to him, tell him if we
leave the table.  Easy, little things.  But relentless.  We draw stares,
which we try to ignore, and we smile.  Through gritted teeth.
Parties present their own perils.  Tom is a handsome, slim, dignified man,
well-coordinated and athletic.  But crowded places are difficult to
negotiate.  It’s easy to bump into people, kick a table leg and spill
someone’s drink, step on a foot or two.  It’s hard to juggle food, drink,
and dog, while feeling for a place to put them.  So we run interference,
bringing him food and drink, finding him a place to sit where the dog won’t
get his tail stepped on, making sure he isn’t stuck in a corner somewhere
alone.  Mingling requires careful forethought, explicit instructions and
descriptions, single-minded focus and attentiveness.  Forget spontaneity.
Professional/social events—now those can get gnarly, the obligatory
white-tablecloth-and-red-wine affairs where most of us feel a little
nervous, edgy; where we’re on our best behavior, with our pinky out, our
forks analyzed, our napkins just so.  Most of us suffer through those
dinners and speeches by watching what everyone else is doing.
My husband relies on me, or another companion, to explain protocol.
And it gets old, it gets frustrating, you just wish you didn’t always have
to be so carefully attuned.
We jokingly call Tom “His Eminence, Dr. Weidner.”  My husband is a college
professor, a scholar and researcher with an international reputation.  He
runs (indoors, on a treadmill), cycles competitively, lifts weights
maniacally; he has been cross-country skiing in Alaska, whitewater rafting
in the Appalachians and hiking in the Sierra Nevada.  He embraces life and
lives fully, facing the inevitable challenges, obstacles, and frustrations
with aplomb.  His formidable courage, strength, and heart inspire friends,
family, students, colleagues.  His multi-tasking skills would boggle the
minds of most CEOs, and might even impress a mother of young children—there
is much to think about and remember when you can’t see.  Students, past and
present, learn not only from his vast knowledge store but from his example
and attitude.
Nevertheless, to live with blindness is to face relentless obstacles, in
every pathway.  Adaptive technology, well-trained guide dogs, supportive
family, and the mostly-reliable kindness of strangers can take you only so
far; the rest involves grit, wit, humor, and above all, tenacity.  Blindness
is not something one “gets over.”  Much like
grief:  You don’t get over it, you live with it.  You maneuver around it,
laugh at yourself, lose some of your vanity, abandon foolish
self-consciousness.  I’m not planning to trade in my husband of nearly
thirty years for another flawed human whose eyes work.  But I won’t pretend
blindness doesn’t hamper his life—and the lives of all who love him.  Dr.
Nelson was right.  Blindness is, indeed, a grievous disability.
URL:
http://twohawksquarterly.com/2010/06/04/on-his-blindness-by-lauren-bishop-we
idner/

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

[1] Used by permission.  Quoted from Beth Finke’s radio essay “Christopher
Reeve’s Legacy for the Disabled,” available at
http://www.bethfinke.com/media.html.


--
Avinash Shahi
M.Phil Research Scholar
Centre for The Study of Law and Governance Jawaharlal Nehru University New
Delhi India

Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of
mobile phones / Tabs on:
http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessind
ia.org.in


Search for old postings at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/

To unsubscribe send a message to
accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in
with the subject unsubscribe.

To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please
visit the list home page at
http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in


Disclaimer:
1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the
person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity;

2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails
sent through this mailing list..


Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of 
mobile phones / Tabs on:
http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in


Search for old postings at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/

To unsubscribe send a message to
accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in
with the subject unsubscribe.

To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please 
visit the list home page at
http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in


Disclaimer:
1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the 
person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity;

2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent 
through this mailing list..

Reply via email to