wether this is applicable to indian railways also?
Regards
sazid

On 7/24/14, avinash shahi <[email protected]> wrote:
> Delhi High Court has asked the Centre to modify its 2013 office
> memorandum after considering the representation of NGO National
> Federation of Blind on computation of seats to be reserved for
> disabled persons in four category posts in government departments.
> http://www.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/quota-for-disabled-hc-asks-centre-to-modify-om-on-vacancies-114071801209_1.html
> "We are of the view that the modification made to Para 14 of Office
> Memorandum dated December 29, 2005 alone vide fresh OM dated March 03,
> 2013 is not in compliance with the directions of the Supreme Court.
> Therefore, there shall be a direction to the respondents (Centre) to
> make further modifications to OM dated December 29, 2005," a bench of
> Chief Justice G Rohini and Justice R S Endlaw said.
>
> The court asked the NGO to make the representation to the Centre
> within four weeks and the authorities will have to "consider the same
> and issue a fresh OM within six weeks thereafter" on the methodology
> of computation of vacancies in all Group A, B, C and D in government
> sector.
>
> The apex court had said that the computation of vacancies "shall be in
> case of Group A, B, C & D posts in an identical manner and that the
> same shall be on total number of vacancies in the cadre strength".
>
> The high court said the 2013 office memorandum on computation of
> vacancies in government departments to provide three per cent quota to
> disabled persons was not in compliance of the apex court direction.
>
> The court's verdict came on a fresh plea of National Federation of
> Blind seeking reliefs including modification of office memorandum to
> provide for computation of posts to be reserved for disabled persons.
>
> The NGO had also sought issuance of fresh OM to "all the
> establishments and PSUs" asking them to launch of special recruitment
> drive to fill the backlog vacancies.
>
> Earlier, the High Court had passed a slew of directions to the Centre
> for providing quota for disabled persons.
>
> It had asked the Centre to form a committee officials, including the
> Chief Commissioner for Disabilities (Chairman), and others to do
> various acts to work out backlog of vacancies for disabled persons.
>
> It had also asked the Centre to undertake special recruitment drive to
> fill the backlog of vacancies by 2010.
>
> --
> Avinash Shahi
> M.Phil Research Scholar
> Centre for The Study of Law and Governance
> Jawaharlal Nehru University
> New Delhi India
>
>
>
> Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of
> mobile phones / Tabs on:
> http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in
>
>
> Search for old postings at:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>
> To unsubscribe send a message to
> [email protected]
> with the subject unsubscribe.
>
> To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please
> visit the list home page at
> http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
>
>
> Disclaimer:
> 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the
> person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity;
>
> 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails
> sent through this mailing list..
>



Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of 
mobile phones / Tabs on:
http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in


Search for old postings at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

To unsubscribe send a message to
[email protected]
with the subject unsubscribe.

To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please 
visit the list home page at
http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in


Disclaimer:
1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the 
person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity;

2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent 
through this mailing list..

Reply via email to