SC dismisses yet another attempt of Centre to sabotage reservation for
employees with disabilities in promotion
Dear Colleagues,

Please refer to my earlier posts "Physically Challenged Versus Logically
Challenged
<http://disabilityrightsthroughcourts.blogspot.in/2013/12/physically-challenged-versus-logically.html>"
dated 10 Dec 2013 and  "SC clarifies 3% reservation in appointment for
disabled extends to promotions and deputations as well
<http://disabilityrightsthroughcourts.blogspot.in/2014/10/sc-clarifies-3-reservation-in.html>"
dated 10 October 2014 .

Despite a three judge bench of the then Chief Justice, Justice Kurian
Joseph & Justice Rohinton Fali Nariman of the Hon'ble Supreme Court
rejecting the Centre's argument against the reservation in promotion for
persons with disabilities on 12th Sep 2014 in Special Leave to Appeal (C)
CC No(s). 13344/2014
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9pA0kt0x8XwQ2hPblNlZE1pbDQ/view>  in
terms of The Persons with Disabilities Act 1995, the Union of India (read
DoPT) has been dilly-dallying on the implementation of the Bombay High
Court judgement in PIL 106/2010 dated 04 Dec 2013 titled
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9pA0kt0x8XwVnluVXFKZ0JpbmpHWGx1RmRnOVJVNC1WNElV/edit>National
Confederation for Development of Disabled Versus Union of India and Ors
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9pA0kt0x8XwVnluVXFKZ0JpbmpHWGx1RmRnOVJVNC1WNElV/edit>
,  by preferring some or the other objections since September 2014.

However, finally on 27 Feb 2015, a bench of Hon'ble Chief Justice HL Dattu
and Mr. Justice AK Sikri of Hon'ble Supreme Court, have once again
dismissed a Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No 5914/2015 (Arising
out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05/12/2014 in NOML No.
690/2014 in  RPL No. 85/2014 in PIL No. 106/2010 passed by the High Court
Of Bombay).

"How do you expect disabled persons to compete with the abled persons," the
bench asked while dismissing the appeal filed by the Centre against the
Bombay High Court order directing it and the Union Public Service
Commission to implement a three per cent quota in direct recruitments and
promotions for the disabled in the IAS.

Like last time, The Hon'ble Bench did not give specific reasons. For a copy
of Supreme Court Order dated 27 Feb 2015 *click here
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9pA0kt0x8Xwei1mN1lTMF8wMzg/view?usp=sharing>.*

However, a large section of media was present in the Supreme Court and has
reported the proceedings succinctly.


A report in Times of India covers the entire proceedings as below:

Source: Times of India
<http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Disabled-should-get-reservation-in-promotion/articleshow/46403087.cms>


*‘Disabled should get reservation in promotion’*
Dhananjay Mahapatra, TNN | Feb 28, 2015, 03.33AM IST

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday said the government could not deny
quota in promotion to those who were appointed to a post under the
reservation policy for the physically handicapped.

A bench of Chief Justice H L Dattu and A K Sikri rejected the Union
government's plea to set aside a high court decision ordering that those
appointed in government service through physically handicapped quota would
also be entitled to reservation while getting promoted.

Arguing for the Centre, attorney general Mukul Rohatgi said there were four
categories of civil services and if a person had availed the reservation
benefit in getting a job, it would be unfair to extend the reservation
benefit yet again to him while considering him for promotion to the higher
category of service.

The bench was not convinced. It said, "Why confine the reservation benefit
only to the entry level and not for promotion. If a person is disabled, he
is always disabled. So, as long as the disability continues, he should
continue to get reservation benefits. We feel that these disabled persons
should have reservation not only at the entry level but also at the time of
promotion."

The law provides for 3% reservation to physically challenged persons in
government service. After a long adjudication process on a public interest
litigation, the apex court had directed governments to implement the quota
for disabled and fill the vacancies including backlog.

On October 8, 2013, the SC in a landmark order had directed the Centre and
states to implement within three months an 18-year-old law mandating 3%
reservation for such persons in government jobs.

The 1995 Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of
Rights and Full Participation) Act came into force on February 7, 1996
providing a minimum 3% reservation in government establishments to the
extent of 1% each for persons suffering from blindness or low vision;
hearing impairment; and locomotor disability or cerebral palsy.

The reservations will be implemented by all government departments, public
sector undertakings and government companies at the Centre and states,
enlarging opportunities for persons with disabilities eligible for benefits
under the law.

Rejecting the AG's arguments, the bench of Justices Dattu and Sikri said,
"Don't give a restrictive meaning to reservation by confining it to the
appointment level. Disabled persons should be empowered to compete with
normal people in promotion."

When the AG argued further against grant of reservation benefits in
promotion to disabled persons, the bench cut it short by telling him that
persons belonging to Scheduled Castes and Schedule Tribes got the benefit
of reservation both in appointment and promotion.


Posted in [Disability Rights Through Courts
<http://disabilityrightsthroughcourts.blogspot.in/>] by Subhash C Vashishth

-- 
Warm regards,

Subhash Chandra Vashishth
Mobile: +91 (11) 9811125521
Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. Consider
environment!


Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of 
mobile phones / Tabs on:
http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in


Search for old postings at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

To unsubscribe send a message to
[email protected]
with the subject unsubscribe.

To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please 
visit the list home page at
http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in


Disclaimer:
1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the 
person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity;

2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent 
through this mailing list..

Reply via email to