This order is utterly disgusting: I contend even hundred per cent
blind is fit for a Civil Court judge
If this man approaches the Supreme Court and shows them evidences from
US, South Africa and UK where blind judges hold reputed posts in
Courts; I could hope that the highest Court of the land will pronounce
judgment in his favour. Our judiciary should shed its contradictory
approach while ensuring employment to persons with blindness. If a
blind could become a parliamentarian and  join Indian executive then
there is no doubt he/she is equally competent  to discharge his/her
duty as a Civil Court Judge. India's former CCPD was a blind judge and
exercised all rights as a Civil Court Judge.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chennai/Partial-blindness-shatters-mans-judge-dreams/articleshow/47578609.cms


A person suffering from 70% blindness has failed to secure the post of
a civil judge despite clearing the written examination and viva voce,
as the Madras high court ruled that visual disability of more than the
maximum permissible limit of 50% cannot be allowed for civil judges.

 Dismissing the writ petition of the aspirant V Surendra Mohan,
Justice V Ramasubramanian said, "Taking into account the nature of
duties to be performed by the civil judge, the government, in
consultation with the high court, had proposed to restrict the
applicability of the benefit of reservation only to those whose
disability ranges from 40-50%. If a person has not less than 40%
blindness, he becomes eligible for the benefit of reservation. This
fundamental and essential feature of the reservation is not taken away
by the proposed amendment. The proposed amendment, while not depriving
the benefit of reservation to those who come within the definition of
the expression 'person with disability', restricts it to those whose
percentage of disability, is 50% less. This cannot be termed as
nullifying the effect of the statute."

 Surendra Mohan, a partially blind person with the percentage of
disability at 70%, applied for civil judge post, and passed the
written examination. Since he was not included in the list of
candidates short-listed for viva voce, he filed the present writ
petition for inclusion in the interview list.

 The court first allowed him to participate in the interview and said
the result would be kept in a sealed envelope. But later it passed
orders in favour of declaring the result, in purview of a different
case. Surendra Mohan secured 178 marks out of 400 in written
examination, and 38.25 marks out of 60 in viva voce, it was revealed.

 A difficulty arose because a government order dated August 8, 2014,
had made it clear that the benefit of reservation for the physically
challenged is available only to those blind and deaf candidates whose
percentage of disability is 40-50%.

 S Vijay Narayan, senior counsel for Surendra Mohan, then assailed the
provision saying it sought to dilute the benefits available to
disabled people. Rejecting the submissions, Justice Ramasubramanian
further said it was too late to challenge the selection, because, "a
person, who participates in a process of selection, cannot later turn
around and question the prescription contained in the very
notification for recruitment."


-- 
Avinash Shahi
Doctoral student at Centre for Law and Governance JNU



Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of 
mobile phones / Tabs on:
http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in


Search for old postings at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

To unsubscribe send a message to
[email protected]
with the subject unsubscribe.

To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please 
visit the list home page at
http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in


Disclaimer:
1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the 
person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity;

2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent 
through this mailing list..

Reply via email to