+1
----- Original Message ----- | From: "Jesse Yates" <[email protected]> | To: [email protected] | Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2011 3:38:22 PM | Subject: Re: Mocking framework | Agreed that for 1 test, its not really worth it. However, the point | would | be to establish these frameworks as really part of how testing is done | going forward. | | So, yeah, 1.5 seems like the better place to put that part of the | patch. | I'll break up ACCUMULO-19 into just the fix for BatchDeleter and then | add | tickets for adding mocking and another for testing for the batch | deleter. | | Sound good? | | -- Jesse | ------------------- | Jesse Yates | 240-888-2200 | @jesse_yates | | On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Billie J Rinaldi | <[email protected] | > wrote: | | > On Monday, October 31, 2011 11:52:11 PM, "Jesse Yates" < | > [email protected]> wrote: | > > Are there any objections to adding EasyMock and PowerMock as the | > > mocking frameworks? | > | > I am reluctant to add new dependencies for a single test, which | > would be | > the case in 1.4 at this point. If you (or anyone) would be | > interested in | > making substantial improvements to 1.5 by adding new tests and/or | > improving | > existing tests using these mocking frameworks, I think that would be | > very | > useful and would provide sufficient justification for the new | > dependencies. | > (A 1.4 branch will be created soon, perhaps tomorrow, and the trunk | > will | > become 1.5.) | > | > Billie | >
