Thanks Marcel,

I have a question concerning continuous integration.

I propose to create a continuous integration chain. At Apache we can use Continuum (that I currently use for AutoDeploy http://continuum.nanthrax.net) or Hudson (that we use on ServiceMix).

What do you think ?

Regards
JB

Marcel Offermans wrote:
On Dec 6, 2009, at 19:59 , Toni Menzel wrote:

Because
- Brian, Jean-Babtiste, and me are now full committers
- Changes on github fork are small, i would go for keeping the mavenization
work at the apache repo and commit stuff right away in either:
a.) a branch svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ace/[ant2maven]
b.) directly in trunk, but keeping the current structure alive in parallel.
(doable because changes are either new (poms, folders) or copies
(resources/sources).
c.) history is preserved and no git/svn bridging work is required when
merging back.

whats the way to go for ? Would then try to keep this in sync (for everyone
to collaborate) and done as soon as possible.

Whatever variation we choose, I think it would be good if we can quickly 
compare the Ant and Maven builds until we're sure that everything works.

I think we can create a new folder in trunk (option b) and start copying things 
over.

Also, no doubt we'll run into issues when doing the conversion, so I've added a 
"Maven Build" component to JIRA, so we can easily keep track of them.

Greetings, Marcel


--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré (Nanthrax)
BuildProcess/AutoDeploy Project Leader
http://buildprocess.sourceforge.net
[email protected]
PGP : 17D4F086

Reply via email to