Hi When writing the IANA mapping sections for the ACE framework and CWT I first required registrations to include the CBOR major type, Later I did not (e.g. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz-02#section-10.7). I would like to here the preferences of the group so that we can update mapping registries to have the same format.
The benefit of having the CBOR major type in the registry is that one then has more of the important information in one place. On the other hand it is not relay necessary to have it there, the reason for the mapping registries is to avoid CBOR label/key conflicts between attributes. So information about In COSE (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-cose-msg-13) it is included "value This contains the CBOR type for the value portion of the label." I would vote to keep data in registries at a minimum, i.e. exclude CBOR Major type from there. Opinions? Best regards //Samuel
_______________________________________________ Ace mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
