Sandeep Kumar <[email protected]> wrote: > DTLS relaying draft was in DICE wg. The WG was not chartered for the > activity. Other SDOs picked it up and filed the gaps.
mcr> For DTLS, I thought we had a few IDs on how to relay DTLS in a
mcr> stateless manner. I can't seem to find any (Yes, I did look through
mcr> expired drafts
mcr> too).
I was reminded in a private email that the document I wanted was yours:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kumar-dice-dtls-relay-02
but it does not detail what the DRY header would look like.
I assume it has to fit into DTLS clothing so that it can be demux'ed.
I was hoping that your document had already figured that part out.
Perhaps you have some thinking you can share?
Which SDOs picked up the gap, and where are the documents?
Were there IANA allocations required?
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Ace mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
