On Sun, Mar 4, 2018, at 7:39 PM, Jim Schaad wrote: > IANA does ask for the expert review as part of the processing it does > even for standards track documents. This is because, in part, they are > responsible for doing the final number assignment. That is which number > in the range is actually used. The interesting question would be what > happens if the IESG and the DEs disagree about such things.
This is exactly why I am asking about this. It might also possible to game the system to ask IESG approval of a Proposed Standard that bypasses Expert Review. > I would > expect that this would result in a long discussion with some type of > final agreement between them. > > Jim > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Alexey Melnikov [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Sunday, March 4, 2018 11:19 AM > > To: The IESG <[email protected]> > > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; > > [email protected]; [email protected] > > Subject: Alexey Melnikov's No Objection on draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token- > > 12: (with COMMENT) > > > > Alexey Melnikov has entered the following ballot position for > > draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-12: No Objection > > > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email > > addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > > introductory > > paragraph, however.) > > > > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token/ > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > COMMENT: > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Just to double check: a CWT claim registration from a Proposed Standard > > still > > needs to be submitted to the review mailing list, but it is not really > > subject to > > Expert Review, correct? You might want to make it clearer. > > _______________________________________________ Ace mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
