Dear ACE chairs,
I never heard back on this. Given that CWT is in AUTH48 as RFC-to-be 8392, I
believe it's time to start WGLC on draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession.
Thanks,
-- Mike
From: Mike Jones
Sent: Wednesday, May 2, 2018 2:45 PM
To: Jim Schaad <[email protected]>; Roman Danyliw <[email protected]>
Cc: Ludwig Seitz <[email protected]>; [email protected];
[email protected]; Samuel Erdtman <[email protected]>; Hannes
Tschofenig <[email protected]>; Benjamin Kaduk <[email protected]>
Subject: WGLC for draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession?
The ACE minutes from London
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/101/materials/minutes-101-ace-00 record
that the editors thought that draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession was ready
for working group last call. I haven't seen any further discussion of the
draft on the mailing list since then, making me think that the working group
agrees with this conclusion. Especially given that
draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token is in the RFC Editor Queue (in the Edit state),
it seems like it's probably time to move CWT PoP along as well.
Do the chairs agree, and if so what are the next steps? (For that matter, if
the chairs don't agree, what are the next steps? ;-) )
Thanks all,
-- Mike
_______________________________________________
Ace mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
