Carsten Bormann <c...@tzi.org> wrote:
    > I believe we have needed such a media type in other places, so I have
    > extracted the content of that PR, and revved
    > draft-fossati-core-multipart-ct (of 2013 vintage) with that.  This
    > would give us a media type multipart/core for general use.  (Thanks are
    > due to Klaus and Thomas for helping me with this little exercise.) 

    > CoAP-EST is due to be finished very soon, and extracting this media
    > type from the CoAP-EST draft should only be done if we can avoid
    > creating a hazard for CoAP-EST to be delayed by this.

    > I don’t see such a hazard unless we are having fundamental problems
    > with the approach (but do accept its limited use in the CoAP-EST
    > space).
    
    > So it would be useful to get some quick reactions on whether we can go
    > ahead with this.

I'm very happy, as I posted in another message before I sync'ed my inbox
and got yours.

I also have use of this multipart/core in the constrained extensions to
BRSKI contained in 6tisch-dtsecurity-zerotouch.

-- 
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [ 
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network architect  [ 
]     m...@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [ 
        

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Ace mailing list
Ace@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace

Reply via email to