Hannes Tschofenig <[email protected]> wrote: > why don't you just reference https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7925?
Ignorance :-)
Thank you, I think that we will reference it then;
Section 4.4 includes:
At the time of writing, the
recommended curve is secp256r1, and the use of uncompressed points
follows the recommendation in CoAP. Note that standardization for
Curve25519 (for ECDHE) is ongoing (see [RFC7748]), and support for
this curve will likely be required in the future.
which is what we want to say anyway.
> I am not a big fan of making all sorts of different crypto
> recommendations in our specs that differ slightly.
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [
] [email protected] http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Ace mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
