On 24/10/2018 03:44, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
Just one minor note -- this is a great discussion to see happening!
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 04:43:14PM +0200, Ludwig Seitz wrote:
On 22/10/2018 21:09, Jim Schaad wrote:
* Section 5.8.2 - If the RS is going to do introspection, can it send some
type of "Server Busy - try again in xxx" while it does the introspection
rather than just doing an ack of the request and possibly waiting a long
time?
This is probably transport protocol specific, and we were asked not to
link the framework to a specific protocol, thus I don't know if we can
provide guidance here.
I think it would be okay to say something like "some transport protocols
may provide a way to indicate that the server is busy and the client should
retry after an interval; this type of status update would be appropriate
while the server is waiting for an introspection response". Which does
provide guidance, but in a non-normative fashion that does not require or
prohibit any given transport protocol.
-Ben
Thank you for the suggestion. I will integrate that text.
/Ludwig
--
Ludwig Seitz, PhD
Security Lab, RISE
Phone +46(0)70-349 92 51
_______________________________________________
Ace mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
