Thank you for the new version of your draft.
The only feedback I have to provide is please reconsider the description
of "cbor-iot" within the IANA Considerations. Whilst IoT may be this
WG's focus, it's not the only use case for this encoding scheme.
Regards
On 25/06/2019 17:27, Joel Höglund wrote:
Hi!
(Apologies for cross-posting to people who also follow the core list.)
We have just submitted a revised version of raza-ace-cbor-certificates.
We have clarified why our profiling together with the cbor encoding
allows us to reduce certificate sizes more than any general compression
mechanism. In addition we have opened up for allowing different public
key and signature algorithms, where we propose the use of COSE
identifiers for efficient encoding. Finally we propose to register this
mechanism as one of the compression algorithms in the registry defined
in ietf-tls-certificate-compression.
We look forward to further comments, input and discussions!
Best Regards
Joel Höglund, RISE SICS
_______________________________________________
Ace mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
_______________________________________________
Ace mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
