On 25/09/2019 10:13, Mike Jones wrote:
Does one of you have the time to create a PR today making the two changes? I’ll then be able to review it and publish sometime in the next 24 hours. Or if not, I’ll plan to do it myself while flying back from Korea to the US tomorrow.Thanks all, -- Mike *From:* Samuel Erdtman <erdt...@spotify.com> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 25, 2019 12:18 AM *To:* Ludwig Seitz <ludwig.se...@ri.se>*Cc:* Mike Jones <michael.jo...@microsoft.com>; Benjamin Kaduk <ka...@mit.edu>; draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession....@ietf.org; ace@ietf.org *Subject:* Re: New Version Notification - draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession-07.txt+1On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 8:31 AM Ludwig Seitz <ludwig.se...@ri.se <mailto:ludwig.se...@ri.se>> wrote:On 25/09/2019 02:23, Mike Jones wrote: > I'm fine with us making both of the proposed changes. > > Thanks, > -- Mike > +1-- Ludwig Seitz, PhDSecurity Lab, RISE Phone +46(0)70-349 92 51
I'm in the process of doing the PR, but I noticed that I can only address Ben's (1) and (3).
For (2) Ben was asking for our opinion.I think we could take the note about different key IDs referring to the same key and reintroduce it in the text as it is a useful reminder.
(I mean that chunk:" Note that the value of a Key ID is not always the same for different parties. When sending a COSE encrypted message with a shared key,
the Key ID may be different on both sides of the conversation,with the appropriate one being included in the message based on the recipient of the message.")
/Ludwig -- Ludwig Seitz, PhD Security Lab, RISE Phone +46(0)70-349 92 51
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Ace mailing list Ace@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
