There will hopefully be a secdir review as well before the document goes into IESG evaluation; given this is a pretty small change, I'd say hold off on uploading for now.
Thanks for asking, and thanks David for the review, Ben On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 06:37:25PM +0000, Panos Kampanakis (pkampana) wrote: > Thanks David. Done. I replaced the RFC7525 references with BCP195. > > Should I upload or will there be more Gen-ART reviews? > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ace <[email protected]> On Behalf Of David Schinazi via Datatracker > Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2019 12:49 AM > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: [Ace] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ace-coap-est-15 > > Reviewer: David Schinazi > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review > Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the > IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call > comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-ace-coap-est-?? > Reviewer: David Schinazi > Review Date: 2019-10-05 > IETF LC End Date: 2019-10-18 > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > Summary: Document is clear and well-written. > > Major issues: None. > > Minor issues: None. > > Nits/editorial comments: I believe references to RFC7525 should instead refer > to it as BCP195 to point to future revisions. > > > _______________________________________________ > Ace mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace _______________________________________________ Ace mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
