Magnus Westerlund has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ace-coap-est-17: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ace-coap-est/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Section 5.6: The EST-coaps client MUST support Block1 only if it sends EST-coaps requests with an IP packet size that exceeds the Path MTU. I think the requirement for when Block1 is required to be supported in the above sentence is unclear. Is the intention to say: An EST-coaps MUST support block1 to be capable to send requests that would otherwise result in the reliance on IP level fragmentation? _______________________________________________ Ace mailing list Ace@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
