Alexey Melnikov wrote: > I am tempted to suggest that the text should be change to "SHOULD include > Uri-Host and Uri-Port". Basically, if an implementation knows for sure that > it is not needed, the SHOULD can be violated, but the recommended default is > safe for all cases.
I would prefer if draft-ietf-ace-coap-est didn't say anything here, since the Uri-Host and Uri-Port options and whether they should be omitted or not is entirely specified by CoAP [RFC7252].* At most, draft-ietf-ace-coap-est can give some implementation guidance. I don't really see why that's necessary, though, since the implementation of Uri-Host and Uri-Port is the same for all CoAP-based applications and not specific to EST. Klaus *(In short, RFC 7252 specifies that Uri-Host and Uri-Port are omitted if and only if their respective default values are desired.) _______________________________________________ Ace mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
