Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> I am tempted to suggest that the text should be change to "SHOULD include 
> Uri-Host and Uri-Port". Basically, if an implementation knows for sure that 
> it is not needed, the SHOULD can be violated, but the recommended default is 
> safe for all cases.

I would prefer if draft-ietf-ace-coap-est didn't say anything here,
since the Uri-Host and Uri-Port options and whether they should be
omitted or not is entirely specified by CoAP [RFC7252].*

At most, draft-ietf-ace-coap-est can give some implementation
guidance. I don't really see why that's necessary, though, since the
implementation of Uri-Host and Uri-Port is the same for all CoAP-based
applications and not specific to EST.

Klaus

*(In short, RFC 7252 specifies that Uri-Host and Uri-Port are omitted
if and only if their respective default values are desired.)

_______________________________________________
Ace mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace

Reply via email to