Hello Lars, Thank you for your review. Your issues have been fixed in -14.
/Ludwig > -----Original Message----- > From: Lars Eggert via Datatracker <[email protected]> > Sent: den 25 mars 2021 12:11 > To: The IESG <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-ace-oauth- > params-13: (with COMMENT) > > Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params-13: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email > addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory > paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > All comments below are very minor change suggestions that you may choose > to incorporate in some way (or ignore), as you see fit. There is no need to > let > me know what you did with these suggestions. > > Paragraph 1, nit: > Elwyn Davies' Gen-ART review > (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/Yauw_b5iNrPx- > nQ095FyFKmQxlM/) > contained some nits that I wanted to make sure you were aware of. > > Section 12.1, paragraph 1, nit: > > [I-D.ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession] > > Jones, M., Seitz, L., Selander, G., Erdtman, S., and H. > > Tschofenig, "Proof-of-Possession Key Semantics for CBOR > > Web Tokens (CWTs)", draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of- > > possession-11 (work in progress), October 2019. > > Outdated reference: draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession has been > published as RFC 8747 > > Section 12.1, paragraph 2, nit: > > [I-D.ietf-oauth-mtls] > > Campbell, B., Bradley, J., Sakimura, N., and T. > > Lodderstedt, "OAuth 2.0 Mutual-TLS Client Authentication > > and Certificate-Bound Access Tokens", draft-ietf-oauth- > > mtls-17 (work in progress), August 2019. > > > > Outdated reference: draft-ietf-oauth-mtls has been published as RFC 8705 > > Section 12.1, paragraph 4, nit: > > [RFC7049] Bormann, C. and P. Hoffman, "Concise Binary Object > > Representation (CBOR)", RFC 7049, DOI 10.17487/RFC7049, > > October 2013, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7049>. > > Obsolete normative reference: RFC 7049 (Obsoleted by RFC 8949) > > Section 1, paragraph 3, nit: > - Respresentation (CBOR) [RFC7049], JSON [RFC8259] MAY be used as an > - - > + Representation (CBOR) [RFC7049], JSON [RFC8259] MAY be used as an > > _______________________________________________ Ace mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
