Hi Zahed,
Thank you very much for the review! We have incorporated your changes in the
newly submitted v-18
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ace-oscore-profile-18 , but
you can also see the specific changes in the github:
https://github.com/ace-wg/ace-oscore-profile/commit/e234968d5078e667a0646fba3e708729c39dcadd
Answers inline.
Thanks again,
Francesca
On 24/03/2021, 21:07, "iesg on behalf of Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker"
<iesg-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of nore...@ietf.org> wrote:
Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ace-oscore-profile-17: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ace-oscore-profile/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks for this document.
I support Roman's discuss and have similar observations when it comes to
normative text usage (see Roman's discuss comments).
FP: Yes, we have now addressed his discuss.
Some nits below --
* Section 2:
This
profile RECOMMENDS the use of OSCORE between client and AS, to reduce
the number of libraries the client has to support, but other
protocols fulfilling the security requirements defined in section 5
of [I-D.ietf-ace-oauth-authz] (such as TLS or DTLS) MAY be used as
well.
[TLS, DTLS] reference is missing.
FP: Right, added.
* Section 3.2:
Typo : s/parameeter/parameter
FP: Fixed.
_______________________________________________
Ace mailing list
Ace@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
