Hello Ace, I'm currently dealing with some nits in draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz that I have discovered during the final IANA check. For one of them I need group feedback:
The draft defines a CBOR abbreviation for the Introspection parameter 'cti' which is the CWT identifier defined in RFC 8392, however it turns out that parameter was never defined as Introspection response parameter, it only exists as CWT claim. Can this draft just add 'cti' to the OAuth Token Introspection Response parameters without affecting the progress of the draft at this stage? (For those interested, the other nits are: 1. Inconsistent IANA tables where some had the column "Original Specification" and some didn't for the CBOR abbreviation mappings, 2. An obsolete reference that needed to be updated in an IANA entry). /Ludwig -- Ludwig Seitz Infrastructure Security Analyst Combitech AB Djäknegatan 31 . SE-211 35 Malmö . Sweden Phone: +46 102 160 846 ludwig.se...@combitech.com . combitech.com This e-mail is private and confidential between the sender and the addressee. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying or disseminating it or any information in it. Please notify the above of any such misdirection Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail! _______________________________________________ Ace mailing list Ace@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
