Hi Lars, my apologies for again using an older word.
> On 2022-03-07, at 10:38, Lars Eggert via Datatracker <[email protected]> wrote: > > Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-ace-aif-06: No Objection > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > The IANA review of this document seems to not have concluded yet. This is just due to the updated I-D revision, IIUC. The expert reviews are in. > Found terminology that should be reviewed for inclusivity; see > https://www.rfc-editor.org/part2/#inclusive_language for background and more > guidance: > > * Term "traditionally"; alternatives might be "classic", "classical", > "common", "conventional", "customary", "fixed", "habitual", "historic", > "long-established", "popular", "prescribed", "regular", "rooted", > "time-honored", "universal", "widely used", "widespread". Fixed in https://github.com/cabo/ace-aif/commit/816eccf (We actually don’t need to emphasize the “time-honored” aspect here; “capability list” is just terminology that some readers that care about authorization will know.) > Thanks to David Schinazi for their General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) review > (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/_BxkOEZJVOgcLQdyMj3dV0NYRB0). > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > All comments below are about very minor potential issues that you may choose > to > address in some way - or ignore - as you see fit. Some were flagged by > automated tools (via https://github.com/larseggert/ietf-reviewtool), so there > will likely be some false positives. There is no need to let me know what you > did with these suggestions. Just a data point — languagetool had pointed me to each of these and I had already decided to stay with the original words. There should be a “<sic>…</sic>” in RFCXML :-). (It also pointed me to a dozen other places that I did change.) Grüße, Carsten _______________________________________________ Ace mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
