Fixed back in the new commit. Thank you! I wasn't sure how to react to downref comment.
On Wed, 9 Mar 2022 at 23:39, Benjamin Kaduk <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 11:27:40PM +0000, Francesca Palombini wrote: > > > > Just one note: for the downref to informative documents (for those > documents that were actually included in the text), please revert the > change – RFC 6234 and RFC 8032 were correctly referenced as normative, > since they are mandatory to implement. MQTT standards are also correctly > referenced normatively. Jean was only noting these appear as downrefs, but > downrefs are not “mistakes”, they just require more attention – see > https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/bcp97 for more information. Downrefs are > usually Last Called to make sure the community is aware of them, except for > those that have appeared as downref for many documents and don’t need to be > Last Called explicitly anymore: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/downref/. > > Exactly so. Thanks for the quick clarification, Francesca! > > -Ben >
_______________________________________________ Ace mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
