Dear Murray, Thank you. artart review comments were addressed in this pull request <https://github.com/ace-wg/mqtt-tls-profile/pull/105>. I aimed to address your other comments in this commit <https://github.com/ace-wg/mqtt-tls-profile/pull/106/commits/ea868ecb5b52e1d39bc8909e20eb241bd377d964>, which was part of the pull request. (All other commits have applied, I haven't realised this didn't take effect.) I will re-apply. Kind regards, --Cigdem
On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 at 12:19, Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker < [email protected]> wrote: > Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-ace-mqtt-tls-profile-16: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to > https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ > for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ace-mqtt-tls-profile/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Thanks to Jean Mahoney for her ARTART review. I encourage the authors to > respond at least to what she identified as minor issues. > > Thanks for resolving my DISCUSS issue. > > The final SHOULD in Section 2.4.2 seems weak to me. I recommend using a > non-BCP 14 "should" instead. > > > >
_______________________________________________ Ace mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
