John Scudder has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ace-extend-dtls-authorize-06: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ace-extend-dtls-authorize/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Nits: - Please expand RS on first use. (It’s first expanded in Section 4 but first used in Section 1.) - “As resource-constrained devices are not expected to support both transport layer security mechanisms. Clients and Resource Servers SHOULD support DTLS and MAY support TLS.” Is this supposed to be one sentence, with a comma between clauses? If not, then I don’t understand the first sentence (fragment). For that matter even if you make the period into a comma, I don’t immediately see how the second clause follows causally from the first, but I’m not too bothered about this. _______________________________________________ Ace mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
