> > It really isn't crucial, unlike the other collaborators used by > > AbstractSecurityInterceptor. I'm happy to add null detection so > > RunAsManager-related code is skipped if the property is null. Does > > anyone have any concerns with this? > > Ouch ! Don't do that ! This would be horrible. Actually, > what you should do is provide a NullRunAsManager - an > implementation that does absolutely nothing. This way, you > don't have to check for null everytime you use the manager, > and you keep the value easily overridable by the user in his config.
I've just checked in the changes suggested by Francois, and reduced the quick-start XML bean entries accordingly. Further configuration complexity reducing suggestions are welcome. Best regards Ben ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson & Lucent use to deliver higher performing products faster, at low TCO. http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3 _______________________________________________ Acegisecurity-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer