> > It really isn't crucial, unlike the other collaborators used by 
> > AbstractSecurityInterceptor. I'm happy to add null detection so 
> > RunAsManager-related code is skipped if the property is null. Does 
> > anyone have any concerns with this?
> 
> Ouch !  Don't do that !  This would be horrible.  Actually, 
> what you should do is provide a NullRunAsManager - an 
> implementation that does absolutely nothing.  This way, you 
> don't have to check for null everytime you use the manager, 
> and you keep the value easily overridable by the user in his config.

I've just checked in the changes suggested by Francois, and reduced the
quick-start XML bean entries accordingly.

Further configuration complexity reducing suggestions are welcome.

Best regards
Ben



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software
Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson & Lucent use to deliver
higher performing products faster, at low TCO.
http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3
_______________________________________________
Acegisecurity-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer

Reply via email to