+1  on backporting to 0.8

Ben, what is the roadmap / timelines for 0.9 ?    August -ish?

Regardless, I would expect that such a fix would probably need to be in
sooner than later ?

Cheers,
Mark



                                                                           
             Seth Ladd                                                     
             <[EMAIL PROTECTED]                                             
             >                                                          To 
             Sent by:                  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
             acegisecurity-dev         eforge.net                          
             [EMAIL PROTECTED]                                          cc 
             s.sourceforge.net                                             
                                                                   Subject 
                                       Re: [Acegisecurity-developer]       
             07/11/2005 06:02          Contexts left in ThreadLocal,       
             PM                        leading to user switching?          
                                                                           
                                                                           
             Please respond to                                             
             acegisecurity-dev                                             
                  eloper                                                   
                                                                           
                                                                           




Ben Alex wrote:
> Seth Ladd wrote:
>
>>
>> Thanks Ben.  How stable is the HEAD?  This is a big deal for us, as
>> we're experiencing users having the wrong credentials.  We need to
>> upgrade ASAP or take out Acegi (which I'd hate to do).
>>
> HEAD is stable, I am using it on projects without hesitation. I would
> encourage you to upgrade. I could checkout the snapshot and do a release
> for the 0.7.0 series to correct the bug, but it would be a bit of time
> that seems better applied to getting 0.9.0 formally released. Do others
> agree? Sorry for the inconvenience.

Thanks Ben.  I don't know what the user base is for 0.7, or 0.8.  I
would consider this a _very important_ fix, enough to backport to 0.8 at
least.  When you're on the other end of a phone call with an irate
customer ("Why am I looking at someone else's info??"), you'll know what
I mean. :)

Seth


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!' webinar
happening
July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the latest in dual
core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event hosted by HP,

AMD, and NVIDIA.  To register visit http://www.hp.com/go/dualwebinar
_______________________________________________
Home: http://acegisecurity.sourceforge.net
Acegisecurity-developer mailing list
Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!' webinar happening
July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the latest in dual
core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event hosted by HP, 
AMD, and NVIDIA.  To register visit http://www.hp.com/go/dualwebinar
_______________________________________________
Home: http://acegisecurity.sourceforge.net
Acegisecurity-developer mailing list
Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer

Reply via email to