Thanks. I've updated CVS accordingly. Tim Kettering wrote:
I would think the value for (2^^1) should be (2) not (1) as seen below? Subclasses must indicate the permissions they support. Each base permission should be an integer with a base 2. ie: the first permission is 2^^0 (1), the second permission is 2^^1 (1), the third permission is 2^^2 (4) etc. Each base permission should be exposed by the subclass as a |public static final int|. It is further recommended that valid combinations of permissions are also exposed as |public static final int|s.
-- Luke Taylor. Monkey Machine Ltd. PGP Key ID: 0x57E9523C http://www.monkeymachine.ltd.uk ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click _______________________________________________ Home: http://acegisecurity.sourceforge.net Acegisecurity-developer mailing list Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer
