Carlos Sanchez wrote:
Hi,
I'd really encourage the use of two jars, core and core-tiger, instead
of packaging the tiger classes inside core jar, because the core-tiger
probably depends on core and you don't want core to depend on tiger.
You'll notice the problem of that approach in any tool with transitive
dependency resolution like Maven2, Ivy or any other.
Thanks Carlos
Given Carlos' advice, it seems to me like we should stick to separate
acegi-security-xx.jar and acegi-security-tiger-xx.jar files to properly
support transitive dependencies. Do others agree?
Cheers
Ben
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
Home: http://acegisecurity.sourceforge.net
Acegisecurity-developer mailing list
Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer
