Ben Alex wrote (21 August 2005):

Is anyone interested in taking over the LDAP effort? Failing volunteers, I will probably take this on when I next do a major batch of changes and hope Robert can give some review/advice as he has collected most of the requirements in recent months.

Just thought I'd re-send this to the list, in case someone out there is interested in pickup up on the LDAP work? I have had a look today and Robert has a well-progressed solution in CVS. As far as I can see, the LdapPasswordAuthenticationDao is the "simple" version, and this is what the unit tests are for. The LdapPassword2AuthenticationDao is more modular, with more features, but there are no unit tests. Still, it looks like the better one to focus on including in 0.9.0.

I'd take on the LDAP work myself, but I currently have another 14 changes related to 0.9.0 outstanding and thought someone out there might have a need for it (I don't need LDAP capabilities myself). If interested, please send a note to the list. Otherwise we'll probably have to shift LDAP support to 1.0.0 or later.

Best regards
Ben


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Home: http://acegisecurity.sourceforge.net
Acegisecurity-developer mailing list
Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer

Reply via email to