The Acegi home page states that Acegi supports RFCs 1945, 2069, and 2617. 2617 covers Digest Access Authorization and superceeds 2069, However, the home page states that Acegi supports 1945 (HTTP 1.0), but is silent on 2616 (HTTP 1.1). I read the security sections on both RFCs. From an Acegi perspective I don't see any differences. Is there a reason for the lack of support of 2616?
http://www.w3.org/Protocols/Specs.html#Hypertext http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc1945/rfc1945 http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2616.txt ~~George ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ Home: http://acegisecurity.org Acegisecurity-developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer
