I'm all for better, more reusable LDAP code.  I think the main issue with LDAP is the variety of ways in which it can be configured and used; so moving stuff into a template class as suggested would seem to make a lot of sense.


Luke Taylor wrote:
Hi all,

I've got some changes I want to make to the LDAP code to address some shortcomings which have come to light. I thought I'd run them past the list so that those who are interested in LDAP in Acegi have a chance to comment. I've moved the main content of this mail into a JIRA issue

http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/spring/browse/SEC-264

Comments, questions or better suggestions are welcome there or here on the list.

Luke.


P.S. No comments about RC versions please. That boat's already sailed :). I'd like to get the best working API we can come up with in place pre-1.0 rather than have to make changes in future versions. Bugs are another matter and can be fixed in 1.0.1.




-- 
    Robert r. Sanders
    Chief Technologist
    iPOV
    (334) 821-5412
    www.ipov.net


Reply via email to