+1 on helping Jackrabbit. I'm all for non duplication of effort. :) - Andy On Monday 07 March 2005 03:16 am, Ben Alex wrote: > ... > My vote is for offering to help Jackrabbit implement an IoC-supporting > design. If we can achieve that, it is of benefit to all IoC communities, > not just Spring. We'd probably still continue with this project and > focus on a Spring JSR 170 abstraction layer (eg wrap all those checked > exceptions), and value-adding the Jackrabbit core infrastructure with > Spring-specific features (eg ACL integration, nice PropertyEditors to > facilitate wiring, JDBC-based repository etc). > > Any thoughts? > > Cheers > Ben > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Acegiwebdav-developer mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegiwebdav-developer
------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Acegiwebdav-developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegiwebdav-developer
