Am Tue, 23 Dec 2014 15:50:05 -0500
schrieb Richard Barnes <[email protected]>:

> > IIUC, you're suggesting that there's a risk that Dreamhost might
> > let you register a CNAME record for <md5>.dreamhosters.com that
> > points to <sha1>. comodoca.com.
> > A colleague just said to me: "most shared hosts (like Dreamhost)
> > designate that subdomain you request for webhosting and that it's
> > incredibly unlikely (read: near-impossible) to get them to change
> > their DNS for that to point anywhere other than their shared
> > hosting servers."
> >
> 
> I can confirm that this is the case with Dreamhost, having just tried
> the experiment.  Nonetheless, this seems like kind of a fragile
> assumption, given that there do exist some less-clueful hosting
> providers.

Each dyndns provider does exactly that, allowing you to register a
record with an user chosen name pointing to any IP. This is at least
true for A records, but I could imagine similiar serives (host
forwarding servicde) for CNAME.

So TXT is better in that case (however none of them should be used
without a second factor like whois-mail or to not issue certificates
for the domain name without the host prefix (or even worse wildcards)).

Gruss
Bernd

_______________________________________________
Acme mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme

Reply via email to