> I think we can decide on a mechanism. But getting into long arguments as to
> whether ports other then 443 should be accepted or if so which ones seems
> to be unnecessary.
I am fully in favor of mechanism, not policy. But we would HAVE to change the
protocol to allow a port to be specified.
It's a slippery slope. Taking your argument only a little bit further, should
PKIX have shut down once CABForum spun up?
If you're not a browser or well-established CA, you need special dispensation
to join[1]. That leaves a very important community -- users[2], who haven't
been well-served by previous efforts in this area -- out. I am not sympathetic
to "just let CABForum do it" arguments.
/r$
[1] https://cabforum.org/information-for-potential-members/
[2] some reference to classic Tron here.
_______________________________________________
Acme mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
